Enhanced Object-Based Production Conference: Difference between revisions

From NCOR Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(36 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Event Date and Venue ==
==Event Date and Venue ==


May 13 – 14, 2020
'''This event is currently postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic.'''


SAIC Rosslyn Office
SAIC Rosslyn Office
1901 Ft. Myer Drive
1901 Ft. Myer Drive
Arlington, VA 22207
Arlington, VA 22207
== Conference Goal ==
This conference aims (1) to identify the lessons learned from the Referent Tracking methodology, (2) to explore how these lessons might be translated to the domains of the defense and intelligence communities, (3) to identify potential benefits relating to semantic technology, and (4) to explore how these benefits can enhance OBP.


== Organizer and Contact==
== Organizer and Contact==
For information or to register contact:
[https://davidglimbaugh.com David G. Limbaugh] dglimbau@buffalo.edu
[https://davidglimbaugh.com David G. Limbaugh] dglimbau@buffalo.edu


== Conference Schedule ==
== Schedule of Topics and Speakers ==


Day One: Referent Tracking and Object Based Production
Date: TBD


'''Part I'''


Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: 9:00am – 9:45am (45 minutes)
<u>'''Day One: Referent Tracking and Object Based Production</u>'''
 
 
9:00am '''Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (ISO/IEC 21838-2) and Referent Tracking'''


Barry Smith, Director, National Center for Ontological Research (NCOR)
Barry Smith, Director, National Center for Ontological Research (NCOR)
Using the Common Core Ontologies: 9:45am – 10:45am (60 minutes)


Ron Rudnicki, Senior Ontologist, CUBRC
9:40am '''Using the Common Core Ontologies'''
 
Ron Rudnicki, Senior Ontologist, CUBRC  
 
 
10:30am BREAK
 
 
10:45am '''Introduction to Defense Ontologies'''
 
Forrest B. Hare, SAIC Fellow, Solutions Architect, Cyberspace Operation, SAIC


BREAK: 10:45am – 11:00am (15 minutes)
11:15am '''Object Based Production and Living Intelligence'''


'''Part II'''
Geoff X. Davis,  Program Team Lead, Analytics and Simulation, SAIC


Object Based Production and Living Intelligence: 11:00am – 12:00pm (60 minutes)
SAIC


LUNCH – 12:00pm – 1:00pm
12:00pm LUNCH


'''Part III'''


Recording Reality Using Referent Tracking: 1:00pm – 3:10pm (130 minutes)
1:00pm '''Recording Reality Using Referent Tracking'''


Werner Ceusters, Division Chief, Biomedical Ontology, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo
Werner Ceusters, Division Chief, Biomedical Ontology, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo
Line 42: Line 57:
William Hogan, Professor, Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida
William Hogan, Professor, Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida


BREAK: 3:10pm – 3:25pm (15 minutes)


'''Part IV'''
3:10pm BREAK


Referent Tracking Theory Applied to Object Based Production: 3:25pm – 5:00pm (95 minutes)
 
3:25pm '''Referent Tracking Theory Applied to Object Based Production'''


David Limbaugh, Intelligence Community Postdoc, University at Buffalo
David Limbaugh, Intelligence Community Postdoc, University at Buffalo
Line 55: Line 70:


Nicholas Del Rio, Command and Control Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory
Nicholas Del Rio, Command and Control Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory


Thursday, May 14, 2020
Thursday, May 14, 2020


Day Two: Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry
<u>'''Day Two: Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry</u>'''
 


Purpose: The goal of this session is to continue work on establishing an Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry initiative. Referent Tracking and Object Based Production assume a shared semantic foundation across the intelligence community, which allows for more detailed datasets and a higher potential for knowledge gain.
9am – 12:00pm


9am – 12:00pm (180 minutes)
Purpose: The Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry initiative is an effort to create a governing body that would be responsible for curating a collection of upper- and mid-level ontologies used to tag data in the defense and intelligence domains. The goal of this session is to continue work on the ICOF initiative by discussing how it contributes to the semantic foundation for Referent Tracking and Object Based Production.


== Conference Description ==
== Conference Description ==


'''Conference Purpose:''' This conference aims (1) to identify the lessons learned from the [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/reftrackparadigm.html Referent Tracking] methodology, (2) to explore how these lessons might be translated to the domain of intelligence analysis, (3) to identify potential benefits relating to semantic technology, and (4) to explore how these benefits can enhance OBP.
This conference aims (1) to identify the lessons learned from the [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/reftrackparadigm.html Referent Tracking] methodology, (2) to explore how these lessons might be translated to the domains of the defense and intelligence communities, (3) to identify potential benefits relating to semantic technology, and (4) to explore how these benefits can enhance OBP.


'''The Problem:''' Ever increasing quantities of disaggregated data pose a problem for intelligence analysis. The problem is magnified when much of the data is sparse, obscure, or ever-changing. A key contributor to this problem is the inconsistency of data management policies. Mutually incompatible data management solutions have been and continue to be adopted not only by organizations but also by different departments within organizations. Data, as a result, is difficult to aggregate, and difficult to discover and to interpret, sometimes even difficult to interpret by those who created the data in the first place. This problem of too-much data inconsistently handled has an analogue in medicine in the realm of patient data. Electronic Health Records, for example, are collections of data about patients which grow and change in ways which make it difficult to track the medical state of a patient as it changes over time, for example as patients move between hospitals.  
'''The Problem:''' Ever increasing quantities of disaggregated data pose a problem for intelligence analysis. The problem is magnified when much of the data is sparse, obscure, or ever-changing. A key contributor to this problem is the inconsistency of data management policies. Mutually incompatible data management solutions have been and continue to be adopted not only by organizations but also by different departments within organizations. Data, as a result, is difficult to aggregate, and difficult to discover and to interpret, sometimes even difficult to interpret by those who created the data in the first place. This problem of too-much data inconsistently handled has an analogue in medicine in the realm of patient data. Electronic Health Records, for example, are collections of data about patients which grow and change in ways which make it difficult to track the medical state of a patient as it changes over time, for example as patients move between hospitals.  
Line 75: Line 92:


E-OBP applies not only to data about first-order reality – tanks, people, missions, economic transactions, and so on – but also to data about these data, which it tracks using the same information infrastructure. It tracks when data become available, who made it available, the methods by which it was obtained, and whether it should be trusted [https://buffalo.box.com/s/jryzqr7nh85eu41k0skz1jk8xex9fne8]. It also records when data is discovered to be inaccurate, in a way that allows for more sophisticated error tracking. All of these data are brought together by the system to form a gigantic evolving graph, which forms a comprehensive and continuously adjusted picture of reality structured to allow zooming on identified threats, sensitive areas, government actions, and so forth.
E-OBP applies not only to data about first-order reality – tanks, people, missions, economic transactions, and so on – but also to data about these data, which it tracks using the same information infrastructure. It tracks when data become available, who made it available, the methods by which it was obtained, and whether it should be trusted [https://buffalo.box.com/s/jryzqr7nh85eu41k0skz1jk8xex9fne8]. It also records when data is discovered to be inaccurate, in a way that allows for more sophisticated error tracking. All of these data are brought together by the system to form a gigantic evolving graph, which forms a comprehensive and continuously adjusted picture of reality structured to allow zooming on identified threats, sensitive areas, government actions, and so forth.
== Presenters ==
[https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=icGNWj4AAAAJ Barry Smith] (University at Buffalo)
[https://davidglimbaugh.com David G. Limbaugh] (University at Buffalo)
[https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JLM7L2EAAAAJ&hl=en Ron Rudnicki] (CUBRC, Inc.)
Timothy Lebo (Air Force Research Laboratory)
[http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/ceusters_vita.html Werner Ceusters] (University at Buffalo)
[https://hobi.med.ufl.edu/about/faculty-directory-2/hogan-bill/ William Hogan] (University of Florida)
SAIC


== Participants ==
== Participants ==


TBA
TBA

Revision as of 23:15, 6 April 2020


Event Date and Venue

This event is currently postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic.

SAIC Rosslyn Office

1901 Ft. Myer Drive

Arlington, VA 22207

Conference Goal

This conference aims (1) to identify the lessons learned from the Referent Tracking methodology, (2) to explore how these lessons might be translated to the domains of the defense and intelligence communities, (3) to identify potential benefits relating to semantic technology, and (4) to explore how these benefits can enhance OBP.

Organizer and Contact

For information or to register contact:

David G. Limbaugh dglimbau@buffalo.edu

Schedule of Topics and Speakers

Date: TBD


Day One: Referent Tracking and Object Based Production


9:00am Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (ISO/IEC 21838-2) and Referent Tracking

Barry Smith, Director, National Center for Ontological Research (NCOR)

9:40am Using the Common Core Ontologies

Ron Rudnicki, Senior Ontologist, CUBRC


10:30am BREAK


10:45am Introduction to Defense Ontologies

Forrest B. Hare, SAIC Fellow, Solutions Architect, Cyberspace Operation, SAIC

11:15am Object Based Production and Living Intelligence

Geoff X. Davis, Program Team Lead, Analytics and Simulation, SAIC


12:00pm LUNCH


1:00pm Recording Reality Using Referent Tracking

Werner Ceusters, Division Chief, Biomedical Ontology, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo

William Hogan, Professor, Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida


3:10pm BREAK


3:25pm Referent Tracking Theory Applied to Object Based Production

David Limbaugh, Intelligence Community Postdoc, University at Buffalo

Alan Ruttenberg, Director of Clinical and Translational Data Exchange, University at Buffalo

Timothy Lebo, Cyber Operations Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory

Nicholas Del Rio, Command and Control Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory


Thursday, May 14, 2020

Day Two: Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry


9am – 12:00pm

Purpose: The Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry initiative is an effort to create a governing body that would be responsible for curating a collection of upper- and mid-level ontologies used to tag data in the defense and intelligence domains. The goal of this session is to continue work on the ICOF initiative by discussing how it contributes to the semantic foundation for Referent Tracking and Object Based Production.

Conference Description

This conference aims (1) to identify the lessons learned from the Referent Tracking methodology, (2) to explore how these lessons might be translated to the domains of the defense and intelligence communities, (3) to identify potential benefits relating to semantic technology, and (4) to explore how these benefits can enhance OBP.

The Problem: Ever increasing quantities of disaggregated data pose a problem for intelligence analysis. The problem is magnified when much of the data is sparse, obscure, or ever-changing. A key contributor to this problem is the inconsistency of data management policies. Mutually incompatible data management solutions have been and continue to be adopted not only by organizations but also by different departments within organizations. Data, as a result, is difficult to aggregate, and difficult to discover and to interpret, sometimes even difficult to interpret by those who created the data in the first place. This problem of too-much data inconsistently handled has an analogue in medicine in the realm of patient data. Electronic Health Records, for example, are collections of data about patients which grow and change in ways which make it difficult to track the medical state of a patient as it changes over time, for example as patients move between hospitals.

The Research: Intelligence data is useful only if it is available to decision makers when they need it. The subject of this conference is an Intelligence Community (IC) inter-organizational data architecture that has the potential to rapidly handle the enormous amounts of data collected continuously by the IC. The data architecture –– called ‘Enhanced Object-Based Production’ (E-OBP) –– is based on the Referent Tracking (RT) approach developed and tested in the medical domain over some 15 years [1]. E-OBP takes the object-oriented approach of Object-Based Production (OBP) but expands ‘object’ to any salient portion of reality. This allows traditional OBP to be transformed into an expressive, flexible, and scalable, data architecture.

The governing principle of E-OBP is to structure data that objectively mirrors reality in a way that allows tracking. Reality is made of unique entities with shared features and relationships indexed to locations and times. E-OBP uses 1) unique identifiers to refer to unique entities, 2) terms from a controlled vocabulary to represent features, relationships, times, and places, and 3) time-indexed, first-order logic expressible, assertions to represent when an entity has some feature or some relationship to other entities.

E-OBP applies not only to data about first-order reality – tanks, people, missions, economic transactions, and so on – but also to data about these data, which it tracks using the same information infrastructure. It tracks when data become available, who made it available, the methods by which it was obtained, and whether it should be trusted [2]. It also records when data is discovered to be inaccurate, in a way that allows for more sophisticated error tracking. All of these data are brought together by the system to form a gigantic evolving graph, which forms a comprehensive and continuously adjusted picture of reality structured to allow zooming on identified threats, sensitive areas, government actions, and so forth.

Participants

TBA