Information Artifact Ontologies: Difference between revisions
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
Werner Ceusters (Buffalo) | Werner Ceusters (Buffalo) | ||
Janna Hastings (EBI) | Janna Hastings (EBI) | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 31 January 2014
A Full-Day Workshop organized as part of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems FOIS 2014
Rio de Janeiro, September 22, 2014
Background
Information artifacts are artifacts – such as photographs, newspaper articles, entries in databases, computer programs, emails, video clips – which are used in ways that depend on their being about something (having a topic or content or subject-matter). Information artifacts exist in the real world and are used in various ways. In some cases information artifacts are are used in ways that do not depend on their aboutness (as when a newspaper is used to light a fire). In most cases, though, we care about what information artifacts are about, because we exploit this aboutness in achieving our ends. Various attempts have been made to create controlled vocabularies for the consistent formulation of metadata pertaining to entities of these sorts in order to enhance the degree to which the content formulated with their aid will be available to computational reasoning. In addition to their topic (content, aboutness) information artifacts have a variety of further attributes, including format, purpose, evidence, provenance, operational relevance, security markings. Data concerning such attributes (often called ‘metadata’) are vital to the effective exploitation of the reports, images, or signals documents for purposes of discovery and analysis.
A range of resources for the description of such metadata have been developed in the Semantic Web, library science and other communities, including:
- Systems Biology Ontology (SBO): Ontologies using SBO: KiSAO, Teddy.
Definition and Scope
The goal of this workshop is to advance coordination of these efforts along the following axes:
- 1. discussion of foundational issues concerning the ontological treatment of information artifacts and information entities and also concerning issues of dissemination (how can we advance the degree to which different communities use common, useful and usable ontologies)
- 2. addressing the relations, and if possible advancing convergence, between IAO, the family of IAO extension ontologies, and other resources developed to represent information artifacts in various domains.
- 3. sharing of information on existing resources and on plans for further development (including plans for coordination)
The workshop will begin with short tutorial sessions (we anticipate parallel tutorials on different ontology resources). The main part of the meeting will consist of submitted papers under headings 1. and 2., and will conclude with submitted and invited short progress reports under heading 3.
In addition, there will be working session devoted to addressing controversial issues and helping to consolidate plans for future work. Interested participants are invited to submit a one-page description of the issue they plan to address to facilitate progress during the working sessions. We will take steps to ensure that we have at least 6 peer-reviewed papers of a minimum of 5 pages each, in order to allow publication in the CEUR-WS series.
- 1. parallel tutorial sessions on IAO and other ontology resources
- 2. long (5-page) papers discussing foundational issues concerning the ontological treatment of information artifacts and information entities, especially with a view to advancing convergence or alignment of existing resources
- 3. short (1-page) progress reports designed to support sharing of information on existing resources and on plans for further development
Draft Schedule
The workshop will be organized as follows:
9.30-11am Tutorial sessions (including at least one tutorial on IAO)
11.30-12.30pm Research papers
1.30-3.00pm Research papers
3.30-4:30pm Research papers
4:30-5:30pm Short progress reports
Rules for submissions
TBA
Organizing Committee
Mauricio B. Almeida (Minas Gerais)
Mathias Brochhausen (Arkansas)
Laura Slaughter (Oslo)
Barry Smith (Chair, Buffalo)
Scientific Committee (draft)
Renata Maria Abrantes Baracho (Minas Gerais)
Marcello Peixoto Bax (Minas Gerais)
Werner Ceusters (Buffalo)
Janna Hastings (EBI)
Tatiana Malyuta (CUNY)
Ronald Rudnicki (CUBRC, Buffalo)
Renato Rocha Souza (Getúlio Vargas Foundation, Rio)
Timeline
Deadline for submissions: May 22, 2014
Deadline for notification of acceptance: June 15, 2014
Deadline for camera-ready copy August 15, 2014
Workshop proceedings will be published with CEUR-WS
