MANUFACTURING community of practice - Revision history

Phismith at 17:21, 8 October 2017

2017-10-08T17:21:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 8 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[http://ichs.ucsf.edu/open-knowledge-network/ Open Knowledge Networks] (OKN)		[http://ichs.ucsf.edu/open-knowledge-network/ Open Knowledge Networks] (OKN 3rd Workshop))

			[https://www.nitrd.gov/nitrdgroups/index.php?title=Open_Knowledge_Network NITRD]

	:What is the state-of-the-art for open knowledge networks in manufacturing?		:What is the state-of-the-art for open knowledge networks in manufacturing?

Phismith at 20:13, 6 October 2017

2017-10-06T20:13:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 6 October 2017
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:[https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmilinovich/ John Milinovich], Pinterest		:[https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmilinovich/ John Milinovich], Pinterest

			:[https://www.linkedin.com/in/alessandrooltramari/ Alessandro Oltramari], Bosch

	:[https://www.linkedin.com/in/bill-regli-083552/ William Regli], DARPA		:[https://www.linkedin.com/in/bill-regli-083552/ William Regli], DARPA

Phismith at 15:32, 6 October 2017

2017-10-06T15:32:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 6 October 2017
Line 22:		Line 22:
	'''Manufacturing Community of Practice'''		'''Manufacturing Community of Practice'''

	:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith], [http://ncor.us National Center for Ontological Research]		:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith] (Lead), [http://ncor.us National Center for Ontological Research]

	::[https://buffalo.box.com/s/vb1fypiv4zjjeefvmhpt4slw7izfyc76 Slides 1]		::[https://buffalo.box.com/s/vb1fypiv4zjjeefvmhpt4slw7izfyc76 Slides 1]

Phismith at 15:31, 6 October 2017

2017-10-06T15:31:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 6 October 2017
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith], [http://ncor.us National Center for Ontological Research]		:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith], [http://ncor.us National Center for Ontological Research]

			::[https://buffalo.box.com/s/vb1fypiv4zjjeefvmhpt4slw7izfyc76 Slides 1]
			::[https://buffalo.box.com/s/8ceyq4a6kb9761k9eheb0um56xb17gvd Slides 2]

	:[https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmilinovich/ John Milinovich], Pinterest		:[https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmilinovich/ John Milinovich], Pinterest

Phismith at 12:30, 5 October 2017

2017-10-05T12:30:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, 5 October 2017
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:[https://www.nist.gov/people/ram-d-sriram Ram Sriram], NIST		:[https://www.nist.gov/people/ram-d-sriram Ram Sriram], NIST

	:[https://www.energy.gov/eere/amo/articles/welcome-dr-sudarsan-rachuri ~~Ruchari~~ Sudarsan], DOE		:[https://www.energy.gov/eere/amo/articles/welcome-dr-sudarsan-rachuri Sudarsan Rachuri], DOE

	'''Related initiatives in the manufacturing domain'''		'''Related initiatives in the manufacturing domain'''

Phismith at 20:14, 2 October 2017

2017-10-02T20:14:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 2 October 2017
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:Smart Manufacturing		:Smart Manufacturing
	::Large and small companies are creating or buying software tools to support different aspects of model-based development in addition to CAD		::Large and small companies are creating or buying software tools to support different aspects of model-based development in addition to CAD
	::The problem is that these software tools are rarely interoperable, and so digital ~~worklows~~ break where communication is needed with vendors or suppliers, or even across distinct divisions within a single enterprise		::The problem is that these software tools are rarely interoperable, and so digital workflows break where communication is needed with vendors or suppliers, or even across distinct divisions within a single enterprise
	::The Industry Ontologies Foundry ([http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Industry_Ontology_Foundry:_ASME_Workshop_2017 IOF]) is a consortium of government (NIST, Air Force Research Lab), commercial and academic groups interested in addressing this problem by developing a suite of small modular ontologies constructed by analogy with the [http://obofoundry.org OBO Foundry] in the field of biomedicine. Ontologies proposed for inclusion in the suite include:		::The Industry Ontologies Foundry ([http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Industry_Ontology_Foundry:_ASME_Workshop_2017 IOF]) is a consortium of government (NIST, Air Force Research Lab), commercial and academic groups interested in addressing this problem by developing a suite of small modular ontologies constructed by analogy with the [http://obofoundry.org OBO Foundry] in the field of biomedicine. Ontologies proposed for inclusion in the suite include:
	::MatOnto (Materials Ontology)		::MatOnto (Materials Ontology)

Phismith at 20:00, 2 October 2017

2017-10-02T20:00:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 2 October 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:What do we share with other domains? How can we benefit from this synergy?		:What do we share with other domains? How can we benefit from this synergy?

	::The is an initiative to replicate in the manufacturing context some of the successes of ontology in the bioinformatics domain		::The Industry Ontologies Foundry (see below) is an initiative to replicate in the manufacturing context some of the successes of ontology in the bioinformatics domain

	'''Manufacturing Community of Practice'''		'''Manufacturing Community of Practice'''

Phismith at 19:59, 2 October 2017

2017-10-02T19:59:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 2 October 2017
Line 42:		Line 42:
	::Large and small companies are creating or buying software tools to support different aspects of model-based development in addition to CAD		::Large and small companies are creating or buying software tools to support different aspects of model-based development in addition to CAD
	::The problem is that these software tools are rarely interoperable, and so digital worklows break where communication is needed with vendors or suppliers, or even across distinct divisions within a single enterprise		::The problem is that these software tools are rarely interoperable, and so digital worklows break where communication is needed with vendors or suppliers, or even across distinct divisions within a single enterprise
	::The Industry Ontologies Foundry is a consortium of government (NIST, Air Force Research Lab), commercial and academic groups interested in addressing this problem by developing a suite of small modular ontologies constructed by analogy with the [http://obofoundry.org OBO Foundry] in the field of biomedicine. Ontologies proposed for inclusion in the suite include:		::The Industry Ontologies Foundry ([http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Industry_Ontology_Foundry:_ASME_Workshop_2017 IOF]) is a consortium of government (NIST, Air Force Research Lab), commercial and academic groups interested in addressing this problem by developing a suite of small modular ontologies constructed by analogy with the [http://obofoundry.org OBO Foundry] in the field of biomedicine. Ontologies proposed for inclusion in the suite include:
	::MatOnto (Materials Ontology)		::MatOnto (Materials Ontology)
	:::On-going AFRL work (Clare Paul, Wright-Patt) to create a MatOnto, a large materials science ontology growing out of the Materials Genome Initiative		:::On-going AFRL work (Clare Paul, Wright-Patt) to create a MatOnto, a large materials science ontology growing out of the Materials Genome Initiative

Phismith at 19:59, 2 October 2017

2017-10-02T19:59:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 2 October 2017
Line 42:		Line 42:
	::Large and small companies are creating or buying software tools to support different aspects of model-based development in addition to CAD		::Large and small companies are creating or buying software tools to support different aspects of model-based development in addition to CAD
	::The problem is that these software tools are rarely interoperable, and so digital worklows break where communication is needed with vendors or suppliers, or even across distinct divisions within a single enterprise		::The problem is that these software tools are rarely interoperable, and so digital worklows break where communication is needed with vendors or suppliers, or even across distinct divisions within a single enterprise
	::The		::The Industry Ontologies Foundry is a consortium of government (NIST, Air Force Research Lab), commercial and academic groups interested in addressing this problem by developing a suite of small modular ontologies constructed by analogy with the [http://obofoundry.org OBO Foundry] in the field of biomedicine. Ontologies proposed for inclusion in the suite include:
	:Materials		::MatOnto (Materials Ontology)
	::On-going AFRL work (Clare Paul, Wright-Patt) to create a MatOnto, a large materials science ontology growing out of the Materials Genome Initiative		:::On-going AFRL work (Clare Paul, Wright-Patt) to create a MatOnto, a large materials science ontology growing out of the Materials Genome Initiative
			::Product Life Cycle Ontology
	:Manufacturing Capabilities (of companies, of manufacturing equipment, of sensors, of persons ...)		:Manufacturing Capabilities (of companies, of manufacturing equipment, of sensors, of persons ...)
	::Use case: classification of suppliers, screening to select suitable suppliers (risk mitigation in supply-chain management -- for example when accepted bidder might drop out)		::Use case: classification of suppliers, screening to select suitable suppliers (risk mitigation in supply-chain management -- for example when accepted bidder might drop out)

Phismith at 15:46, 2 October 2017

2017-10-02T15:46:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 2 October 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:What do we share with other domains? How can we benefit from this synergy?		:What do we share with other domains? How can we benefit from this synergy?

	::The ~~[http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Industry_Ontologies_Foundry:_ASME_Workshop_2017 Industry Ontologies Foundry]~~ is an initiative to replicate in the manufacturing context some of the successes of ontology in the bioinformatics domain		::The is an initiative to replicate in the manufacturing context some of the successes of ontology in the bioinformatics domain

	'''Manufacturing Community of Practice'''		'''Manufacturing Community of Practice'''
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Use cases span the following broad areas:		Use cases span the following broad areas:

	:Manufacturing Capabilities (of companies, of manufacturing equipment, of sensors, ...)		:Smart Manufacturing
			::Large and small companies are creating or buying software tools to support different aspects of model-based development in addition to CAD
			::The problem is that these software tools are rarely interoperable, and so digital worklows break where communication is needed with vendors or suppliers, or even across distinct divisions within a single enterprise
			::The
			:Materials
			::On-going AFRL work (Clare Paul, Wright-Patt) to create a MatOnto, a large materials science ontology growing out of the Materials Genome Initiative
			:Manufacturing Capabilities (of companies, of manufacturing equipment, of sensors, of persons ...)
	::Use case: classification of suppliers, screening to select suitable suppliers (risk mitigation in supply-chain management -- for example when accepted bidder might drop out)		::Use case: classification of suppliers, screening to select suitable suppliers (risk mitigation in supply-chain management -- for example when accepted bidder might drop out)
	::In progress: scraping information on the webpages of manufacturing companies and mapping terms identified to ontologies to enable reasoning (Farhad Ameri, Collaborative agreement between NIST and Texas State)		::In progress: scraping information on the webpages of manufacturing companies and mapping terms identified to ontologies to enable reasoning (Farhad Ameri, Collaborative agreement between NIST and Texas State)
Line 50:		Line 56:
	:::[http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=902775 OntoSTEP]		:::[http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=902775 OntoSTEP]
	::Can we convert this activity into an ontology-based OKN?		::Can we convert this activity into an ontology-based OKN?
	~~:Materials~~
	~~::On-going AFRL work (Clare Paul, Wright-Patt) to create a MatOnto, a large materials science ontology growing out of the Materials Genome Initiative~~
	:Workforce development		:Workforce development
			::Here again a treatment of relevant capabilities data would potentially bring benefits
	::(from OKN Finance CoP) Creating many economic datasets based on social media, e.g., “i lost my job” to approximate something about the labor market.		::(from OKN Finance CoP) Creating many economic datasets based on social media, e.g., “i lost my job” to approximate something about the labor market.
	:Patents		:Patents