'''Richard de Rozario''' will speak on using competency questions to evaluate ontologies.

[http://eil.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/enterprise-modelling/papers/fadel-wetice94.pdf Fadel, Fox & Gruninger (1994)] introduced “competency questions” as one of the criteria to judge the acceptability of an applied ontology.  What, if any, would be competency questions for a foundational (arguably, “philosophical”) ontology? 

:Venue: Jeannette Martin Room, 5th Floor, Capen Hall, UB North Campus
:Time: Noon, Thursday, September 19

[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_De_Rozario2 Richard de Rozario] is an information systems researcher working at the [https://vimeo.com/350001368 Hunt Lab for Intelligence Research] (University of Melbourne, Australia). His work includes applied ontology research in the defence and intelligence domain. He holds a doctorate in Philosophy (Applied Ontology) from the University of Melbourne, and has previously worked in industry in the areas of information systems and risk analysis