Ontology Modules: Difference between revisions
From NCOR Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
*http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/From_BFO_to_IAO | *http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/From_BFO_to_IAO | ||
[https://ub.webex.com/ub/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=21963527&rKey=aa1c762058fff21e Raw Webex Video] | |||
'''[http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/?page=ceusters_vita Werner Ceusters]: [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/sendfile/?file=or_submission_125_2.pdf Proposed Definitions of IAO Terms]''' | |||
'''[http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ron-rudnicki/4/b00/957 Ron Rudnicki] (CUBRC): [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/information-ontologies.pptx A Discussion of Two Information Ontologies]''' | |||
---- | |||
== Ontology Evaluation == | |||
| Line 110: | Line 111: | ||
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/medo/biodynamic.pdf Introduction to BFO] | :[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/medo/biodynamic.pdf Introduction to BFO] | ||
*'''Werner Ceusters | *'''Werner Ceusters: A Realism-Based Approach to the Evaluation of Ontologies''' [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/sendfile/?file=2012RBOntoEval.pptx Slides] | ||
:We present a novel methodology for calculating the improvements obtained in successive versions of ontologies, using examples from biomedicine. The theory takes into account changes both in reality itself and in our understanding of this reality. The successful application of the theory rests on the willingness of ontology authors to document changes they make by following a number of simple rules. The theory provides a pathway by which ontology authoring can become a science rather than an art, following principles analogous to those that have fostered the growth of modern evidence-based medicine. Although in this paper we focus on ontologies, the methodology can be generalized to other sorts of terminology-based artifacts, including Electronic Patient Records. | :We present a novel methodology for calculating the improvements obtained in successive versions of ontologies, using examples from biomedicine. The theory takes into account changes both in reality itself and in our understanding of this reality. The successful application of the theory rests on the willingness of ontology authors to document changes they make by following a number of simple rules. The theory provides a pathway by which ontology authoring can become a science rather than an art, following principles analogous to those that have fostered the growth of modern evidence-based medicine. Although in this paper we focus on ontologies, the methodology can be generalized to other sorts of terminology-based artifacts, including Electronic Patient Records. | ||
*[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/bfo/Versioning.pdf Paper] | |||
*[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/evaluation.html Background Readings on Ontology Evaluation] | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 21:21, 26 December 2012
The modules below are designed for use in teaching ontology to multidisciplinary audiences in domains such as government and administration, military and biomedical informatics.
They include:
- presentations by ontologists from UB and elsewhere;
- ontology development and planning sessions;
General Ontology
Barry Smith: Introduction to Ontology
- Provides a basic introduction to ontology by addressing questions such as: What is an ontology? What are the differences and interrelations between ontology (philosophy), ontology (science), and ontology (engineering)? How are ontologies used? We will also provide an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), focusing on a discussion of the question: What is a musical score?
Werner Ceusters (Bioinformatics/Psychiatry): Particulars in Focus
- Referent Tracking (RT) is a methodology to create digital copies of the parts of the world we are interested in. It is based on Basic Formal Ontology, but focuses on particulars rather than universals. The goal is to create information systems in such a way that (1) the information they contain mimics the structure of the corresponding portions of reality and (2) they can make optimal use of ontologies and terminologies.
Basic Formal Ontology
Ontology of Mind
Mental Functioning Ontology
Janna Hastings (Swiss Center for Affective Sciences and European Bioinformatics Institute): Representing Mental Functioning Hastings Slides
- Mental functioning includes all the faculties of the mind, e.g., perception, planning, language, memory, emotion, and self-representation. The study of these processes cuts across disciplines such as psychology, psychiatry, neuroscience, and biomedicine. The Mental Functioning Ontology (MFO) is designed to provide a means for the common description of data in all of these disciplines, in order to support data aggregation and comparison. For background material see here (slides) and here (papers).
Barry Smith: Mental Functioning and the Ontology of Language Slides
- Addresses those kinds of mental functioning which involve overt or covert use of language focusing especially on the issue of the directedness of thought and language to extra-mental objects.
Barry Smith: How To Do Things With Diagrams Slides
- Explores some of the ways in which the theory of speech acts can throw light on the role of diagrams and of diagrammatic symbologies in areas such as chess, music, chemistry and military planning. The ontology of processes and process representations plays a central role.
Barry Smith: Ontology and the Austrian Tradition Slides
- A discussion of the theory of intentionality (or the directedness of mental processes), and of the roots of this theory in the philosophy of the Brentano school in Austria. Continues the discussions initiated on September 24 of how mental processes are interrelated in different ways with linguistic processes (for example of speaking, reading, and silent siloloquy).
Barry Smith: 'Mental Functioning Ontology and the ICF: A survey of the WHO's Internal Classification of Functioning Slides
Barry Smith: Neuroscience and the Ontology of Mind: A discussion of the mainstream neuroscience approach to mental directedness Slides
Information Ontology
Alan Ruttenberg: The Basics of the Information Artifact Ontology
- The Information Artifact Ontology (IAO) is an ontology of information entities, originally inspired by needs of the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) to represent measurement data and other information entities associated with investigations such as reports and protocols. A number of issues that have emerged and we are developing a second version to address these issues.
- Basic ideas:
- 1. information artifacts are about, or are intended to be about, some entity
- 2. genes are not information artifacts; gene sequences as recorded in computers are information artifacts
- 3. information artifacts are copyable
- 4. information artifacts are generically dependent continuants which have concretizations, for example in specifically dependent patterns of ink on a piece of paper or of magnetization on a hard drive.
- Discussion:
- How can we define the 'is about' relation, which forms the core of IAO? What is the current strategy, and what breaks? What can information artifacts be about? Non-problematic is the case of particulars. Can information artifacts be about types and if so, what does that mean?
- What is a copying process - the process that results in a new concretization of an information content entity (ICE)? How is copying defined? Is there a constraint on how complicated the copying process can be it can be considered not as copying but as new creation? What happens when the copying is partial?
- How should IAO deal with information artifacts for which the putative topic does not, or might not, exist? Examples are (written) hypotheses, fiction, diagrams of chemical compounds that can't be synthesized, terms such as 'ether' or 'phlogiston' from the history of science, terms such as 'the soup I plan to have for dinner' used in planning.
- How can we define information artifacts in order to circumscribe the scope of IAO? What primitives do we need to rely on?Candidates include: intention, communication, (cognitive) mental function, output (of realization of cognitive mental function).
- How do we deal with syncategorematica (for example the 'the' and the 'not' in 'the table not beside my bed')?
- How do we deal with different encodings of what is putatively the same information artifact, for example resulting from use of different character sets such as ASCII or Unicode?
- Background materials
- http://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology/
- http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/From_BFO_to_IAO
Werner Ceusters: Proposed Definitions of IAO Terms
Ron Rudnicki (CUBRC): A Discussion of Two Information Ontologies
Ontology Evaluation
- Fabian Neuhaus (National Institute of Standards and Technologies): Introduction to Ontology Evaluation Slides
- A Practical Example: Evaluation of the HL7 RIM Ontology
- Relation to OntoClean
- Alternatives to BFO
- Introduction to BFO
- Werner Ceusters: A Realism-Based Approach to the Evaluation of Ontologies Slides
- We present a novel methodology for calculating the improvements obtained in successive versions of ontologies, using examples from biomedicine. The theory takes into account changes both in reality itself and in our understanding of this reality. The successful application of the theory rests on the willingness of ontology authors to document changes they make by following a number of simple rules. The theory provides a pathway by which ontology authoring can become a science rather than an art, following principles analogous to those that have fostered the growth of modern evidence-based medicine. Although in this paper we focus on ontologies, the methodology can be generalized to other sorts of terminology-based artifacts, including Electronic Patient Records.
Social Ontology
See here
Biomedical Ontology
- Alexander Diehl (Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo): From the Gene Ontology to the Neurological Disease Ontology
- Video
- The first part of the talk covers the Gene (GO) and Cell Ontologies (CL), covering issues of ontology structure, development, use in annotation, and exploitation for biological research. The second part will cover the Neurological Disease (ND) and Neuropsychological Testing Ontologies (NPT).
- Background videos:
Introduction to Biomedical Ontology.
- Background Reading
- The Gene Ontology Consortium, "Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology", Nat Genet. 2000 May; 25(1): 25–29.
- Mungall CJ, el al., "Cross-product extensions of the Gene Ontology", J Biomed Inform. 2011 Feb;44(1):80-6.
- Hill DP, et al., "Gene Ontology annotations: what they mean and where they come from", BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 29;9 Suppl 5:S2.
- Meehan TF, et al., "Logical development of the cell ontology", BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jan 5;12:6.
- Cox AP, et al., "Ontologies for the study of neurological disease", ICBO 2012.
- Glossary of biological terms
- The Infectious Disease Ontology (IDO)
- 2. The IDO Core and Its Extensions - Coordination and Interoperability (Lindsay Cowell) Slides
- 3. The IDO-Staph Extension (Albert Goldfain) Slides
- Video (for initial 10 minutes use slides from here)
- Staph aureus diseases and their differentiation
- Antibiotic Resistance (Blocking, Complemenatary and Reciprocal Dispositions) (Albert Goldfain)
- A Lattice of Staph aureus Infectious Diseases
- Background Reading
- IDO website
- LG Cowell, B Smith, "Infectious Disease Ontology", Chapter 19 in Infectious Disease Informatics, V Sintchenko (ed.), 2010, 373-395.
- A Goldfain, B Smith and LG Cowell, “Dispositions and the Infectious Disease Ontology”, in Antony Galton and Riichiro Mizoguchi (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (FOIS 2010), Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2010, 400-413.
Military Ontology
Video presentations on military ontology are provided here.
Military Intelligence Ontology
A tutorial on ontology for intelligence analysis is here
Ontology Software
Teaching material on ontology software is provided here
