Information Meeting on Joint Doctrine Ontology: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
*Col William Mandrick (Institute for Military Support to Governance / Joint Special Operations University): War Fighter Ontology | *Col William Mandrick (Institute for Military Support to Governance / Joint Special Operations University): War Fighter Ontology | ||
*Jason Bryant (AFRL): Introduction to the MAMA Project | *Jason R. Bryant (AFRL): Introduction to the MAMA Project | ||
*Lee Krause (Securboration): MAMA applied to Air Mobility Command | *Lee Krause (Securboration): MAMA applied to Air Mobility Command | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
9:00 Start | 9:00 Start | ||
*Robert J. Farrell (AFRL): The Living Plan in a Distributed Contested Environment | *Robert J. Farrell (AFRL): The Living Plan in a Distributed Contested Environment | ||
*Erik Thomsen (Charles River Analytics): Ontological Support for Living Plan Specification, Execution and Evaluation | *Erik Thomsen (Charles River Analytics): Ontological Support for Living Plan Specification, Execution and Evaluation | ||
*Space Mission Data and Space Ontology (CUBRC, AFRL Rome) | *Space Mission Data and Space Ontology (CUBRC, AFRL Rome) | ||
*Transcom Mission Data and Transport Ontology (Securboration) | *Transcom Mission Data and Transport Ontology (Securboration) | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 21 August 2015
Venue: MACE (Multi-Agency Collaboration Environment), 3076 Centreville Road, Herndon, VA 20171
Date: September 16-17, 2015
Nearest hotel: Hilton Washington Dulles Airport
Registration: $50 flat fee to cover costs
Background
The goal of the Joint Doctrine Ontology Project is to create a formal and computer-readable representation of the content of the major doctrinal publications, using as starting point the definitions in the DoD Dictionary (JP 1-02).
Examples of Potential Benefits
1. to doctrine authors:
- - enabling the creation of flexible visualizations of how different parts of doctrine interact, or of doctrinal content relevant to particular types of operations or capabilities
- - allowing a tracing of dependences between definitions that can help to ensure that changes in definitions cascade appropriately through all dependent definitions when revisions are made
2. to doctrine users:
- - enabling more effective discovery of doctrinal knowledge in forms useful for computational reasoning
- - providing for each term in the DoD Dictionary its own web page, serving as a repository of usage and of revision history,
3. in the form of new uses for the content of doctrine
- - allowing the DoD Dictionary to serve as entry point for web-based searches across multiple repositories of authoritative data
- - facilitating greater coordination of training and operations particularly as these involve IT systems working alongside human beings
- - increasing automation of processes such as plan specification, ops assessment, BlueForce Status, and scenario development
- - allowing new sorts of assessment processes, for example based on measures of adherence to doctrine, processes which may in turn give rise to new ways of computationally identifying areas where changes in doctrine may be needed
The Joint Doctrine Ontology will enable doctrine to serve as a new source of ground truth for ontologists across DoD and IC that will help to identify gaps and errors in existing military ontologies. It will thereby support consistent agile ontology development of a sort that will counteract current tendencies towards silo-formation and failure of interoperation.
Provisional Agenda
September 16
8:30 Coffee available
9:00 Start
- Barry Smith (NCOR): Introduction to the meeting: Addressing DoD information and coordination needs
- Col William Mandrick (Institute for Military Support to Governance / Joint Special Operations University): War Fighter Ontology
- Jason R. Bryant (AFRL): Introduction to the MAMA Project
- Lee Krause (Securboration): MAMA applied to Air Mobility Command
- William Tagliaferri (CUBRC): MAMA applied to the Space Mission
- Ron Rudnicki (CUBRC): Common Core Ontologies (IARPA, I2WD, JIDO, ONR, AFRL, ARL)
12:00 - 13:00 Lunch
- Barry Smith (NCOR): Joint Doctrine Ontology: Strategy, Benefits, Applications
- Initial draft modules:
- JP1 Capstone (Mission) Ontology (Barry Smith)
- JP 3-0 (Operations) Ontology (Barry Smith)
- JP 3-14 (Space Operations) Ontology (Alex Cox, CUBRC)
- JP 3-57 (Civil-Military Operations) Ontology (Col William Mandrick, JSOU and Fort Bragg)
- JP 5-0 (Plan) Ontology (Barry Smith)
- Feedback from Joint Doctrine Staff
- Discussion
- 18:00 Dinner
September 17
8:30 Coffee available
9:00 Start
- Robert J. Farrell (AFRL): The Living Plan in a Distributed Contested Environment
- Erik Thomsen (Charles River Analytics): Ontological Support for Living Plan Specification, Execution and Evaluation
- Space Mission Data and Space Ontology (CUBRC, AFRL Rome)
- Transcom Mission Data and Transport Ontology (Securboration)
12:00 Lunch
13:00 - 15:30 [Closed Session]