Applied Ontology 2018: Difference between revisions
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Advance reading (prior to September 24 lecture): [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912703/ SW Smith and Koppel, 2014] | Advance reading (prior to September 24 lecture): [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912703/ SW Smith and Koppel, 2014] | ||
==September 17: Ontology and Information Engineering | ==September 17: Ontology and Information Engineering in the Healthcare Domain== | ||
:Ontology look-alikes | :Ontology look-alikes | ||
:Use of ontology and look-alikes in biomedical applications | :Use of ontology and look-alikes in biomedical applications | ||
:BFO as benchmark for biomedical IE | :BFO as benchmark for biomedical Information Engineering (IE) | ||
[http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/files/BMI508-PHI598-20180917-Ontology-and-Healthcare-IE-covered.pptx Slides] | [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/files/BMI508-PHI598-20180917-Ontology-and-Healthcare-IE-covered.pptx Slides] | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SCHTAO-29 Toward an Ontological Treatment of Disease and Diagnosis] | :[https://philpapers.org/rec/SCHTAO-29 Toward an Ontological Treatment of Disease and Diagnosis] | ||
==October 8: Protégé | ==October 8: Introduction to Protégé == | ||
[https://protege.stanford.edu/ Protégé] is the leading open-source ontology editor | [https://protege.stanford.edu/ Protégé] is the leading open-source ontology editor | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
Fourth class assignment: Create a simple ontology using Protégé. Deadline: noon, 25 October. | Fourth class assignment: Create a simple ontology using Protégé. Deadline: noon, 25 October. | ||
==October 15: | ==October 15: Pain / Bruxism / Embryontology == | ||
Ontology of Pain | Ontology of Pain | ||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
Fifth class assignment: Create a plan for your presentation on December 3 | Fifth class assignment: Create a plan for your presentation on December 3 | ||
==October 22: Joint Doctrine Ontology / Building an Ethical Warfighter / | ==October 22: Joint Doctrine Ontology / Building an Ethical Warfighter / Terrorism== | ||
Joint Doctrine Ontology (JDO) | Joint Doctrine Ontology (JDO) | ||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
:[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328145335_From_Affective_Science_to_Psychiatric_Disorder_Ontology_as_a_Semantic_Bridge R. R. Larsen and J. Hastings, "From Affective Science to Psychiatric Disorder: Ontology as a Semantic Bridge" (2018)] | :[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328145335_From_Affective_Science_to_Psychiatric_Disorder_Ontology_as_a_Semantic_Bridge R. R. Larsen and J. Hastings, "From Affective Science to Psychiatric Disorder: Ontology as a Semantic Bridge" (2018)] | ||
==October 29: Top-Level Ontologies / The Six-Category Ontology / Truth and | ==October 29: Top-Level Ontologies / The Six-Category Ontology / Truth and Maps== | ||
Top-Level Ontologies | Top-Level Ontologies | ||
| Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
:http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Basic_Formal_Ontology_2.0 Basic Formal Ontology] | :http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Basic_Formal_Ontology_2.0 Basic Formal Ontology] | ||
==November 5: From Speech Acts to Document Acts / | ==November 5: From Speech Acts to Document Acts / Social Agency / Deontics == | ||
From speech acts to document acts | From speech acts to document acts | ||
| Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
:[https://philpapers.org/archive/SMIOPA-3.pdf The Ontology of the Eruv] | :[https://philpapers.org/archive/SMIOPA-3.pdf The Ontology of the Eruv] | ||
==November 26: Why | ==November 26: Why computer science needs philosophy / Why I am not a Philosopher == | ||
Why computer science needs philosophy | Why computer science needs philosophy | ||
| Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
Why I am not a philosopher | Why I am not a philosopher | ||
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/y74umhxrfod6jr5zhh9g659pgea2weld Slides] | [https://buffalo.box.com/s/y74umhxrfod6jr5zhh9g659pgea2weld Slides] [https://youtu.be/e5zjZnbi-ZA Video] | ||
==December 3: | ==December 3: Student Projects == | ||
1:05pm Botan Dolun: The Metaphysics of States | 1:05pm Botan Dolun: The Metaphysics of States | ||
| Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
2:20pm Shyamashree Srinha: Opioid Use Disorder in the | 2:20pm Shyamashree Srinha: Opioid Use Disorder in the | ||
Light of Ontology | |||
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/392qu8r1zksf5ezww8zr1aejxa56log9 Slides] | [https://buffalo.box.com/s/392qu8r1zksf5ezww8zr1aejxa56log9 Slides] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:27, 28 December 2018
PHI 598 Registration 24696
Partially co-located with BMI508 Biomedical Ontology Syllabus
An ontology is a structured collection of terms and definitions that is developed with the goal of making data deriving from heterogeneous sources more easily searchable, comparable or combinable. The course will provide an introduction to ontology from an application oriented point of view, including examples in the areas of data science and artificial intelligence. Examples will be drawn from biology and medicine, social science, law, and finance. The course will be of interest not only to philosophers but also to those interested in biomedical informatics and in the computer and information sciences.
Venue: 200G Baldy, UB North Campus
Time: Mondays, 1:00-3:50pm starting August 27, 2018
Faculty: Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters
Background reading:
- 1. Arp, Spear and Smith, 2016: Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology, MIT Press, 2016
- 2. Smith, 2003 "Ontology"
August 27: Introduction to Ontology
- What is an ontology?
- Key elements of an ontology
- What are ontologies useful for?
First class assignment: write a 2-page essay summarizing the key elements of an ontology as identified in the lecture and comparing them to the view of an ontology offered in Hoehndorf, Schofield & Gkoutos, 2015). Deadline: noon, September 6.
Advance reading (prior to September 10 lecture): 1. Scheuermann, Ceusters and Smith, 2009. 2. Haendel et. al., 2018
September 3: Labor Day – No class
September 10 Basic Formal Ontology
- Top-level ontologies
- Introduction to BFO
BFO can be reviewed here
Advance reading (prior to September 24 lecture): SW Smith and Koppel, 2014
September 17: Ontology and Information Engineering in the Healthcare Domain
- Ontology look-alikes
- Use of ontology and look-alikes in biomedical applications
- BFO as benchmark for biomedical Information Engineering (IE)
Second class assignment: Summarize in a 2-page essay the problems discussed in (SW Smith and Koppel, 2014) and describe how Basic Formal Ontology can assist in dealing solving them
Advance reading (prior to October 1 lecture): Merelli, et al, 2014
September 24: Ontology of Disease
- Disease from the clinician’s perspective,
- Ontological approaches to disease,
- The Ontology for General Medical Science
Third class assignment: Summarize in a 2-page essay the issues discussed in pages 16-21 of Haendel et. al., 2018 and describe how the framework offered by Scheuermann, Ceusters and Smith, 2009 might resolve them.
Advance reading (prior to September 17 lecture): Chapters 5 and 6 of Arp, Smith and Spear, 2016
October 1: Disease / Aging / Ontology Building
Ontology of Disease (Continued)
Ontology of Aging
Ontology Building
Reading:
October 8: Introduction to Protégé
Protégé is the leading open-source ontology editor
This class taught by Brian Donohue
Fourth class assignment: Create a simple ontology using Protégé. Deadline: noon, 25 October.
October 15: Pain / Bruxism / Embryontology
Ontology of Pain
Bruxism
Embryontology
Readings:
Fifth class assignment: Create a plan for your presentation on December 3
October 22: Joint Doctrine Ontology / Building an Ethical Warfighter / Terrorism
Joint Doctrine Ontology (JDO)
Building an Ethical Warfighter
Ontology of Terrorism
Readings:
- Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
- P. Morossof et al., "Joint Doctrine Ontology: A Benchmark for Military Information Systems Interoperability" (2015)
- R. R. Larsen and J. Hastings, "From Affective Science to Psychiatric Disorder: Ontology as a Semantic Bridge" (2018)
October 29: Top-Level Ontologies / The Six-Category Ontology / Truth and Maps
Top-Level Ontologies
The Six-Category Ontology
Truth and the Ontology of Maps
Readings:
- DOLCE: An Upper-Level Ontology
- SUMO Suggested Upper Merged Ontology
- http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Basic_Formal_Ontology_2.0 Basic Formal Ontology]
November 5: From Speech Acts to Document Acts / Social Agency / Deontics
From speech acts to document acts
Massively planned social agency
Deontic entities
November 12: Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Machine Learning / Money
- Overview of machine learning and other approaches to the exploitation of Big Data (presented by Kevin Keane)
- Role of ontology in Data Science
- Ontology of money
Readings:
November 19: The Ontology of the Eruv
The Ontology of the Eruv
Reading:
November 26: Why computer science needs philosophy / Why I am not a Philosopher
Why computer science needs philosophy
Why I am not a philosopher
December 3: Student Projects
1:05pm Botan Dolun: The Metaphysics of States
1:20pm Angie Li: Ontology Representing Human Artificial Reproductive Technologies
1:35pm Zihe Luo: The Music Ontology
1:50pm Jinwei Hu: Patient Conditions: Referent Tracking and Prognostic Terms
2:05pm Alexander Anderson: Quantum Realism
2:20pm Shyamashree Srinha: Opioid Use Disorder in the Light of Ontology
2:40pm William Mangione: The Drug Repurposing Ontology
3:00pm Jonathan Vajda: On the Relation Between a Biospecimen and its Source
3:20pm Eric Merrell: Ontology of Fictional Entities
3:35pm Arlen Brickman: Defining Cancer
Student Learning Outcomes
| Program Outcomes/Competencies | Instructional Method(s) | Assessment Method(s) |
|---|---|---|
| The student will acquire a knowledge of current ontology research in biomedical informatics, data fusion, defense and intelligence | Video lectures and online discussions | Review of submitted content and of participation in class discussions |
| The student will acquire experience in ontology development | Video lectures and critique of successive drafts | Review of results in the form of xsl spreadsheet or Protégé file |
| The student will acquire experience in communicating the results of work on ontology development | Creation of youtube presentation and of associated documentation | Review of results |
Important dates
| Sep 6 | - first class assignment due |
| Sep 24 | - second class assignment due |
| Oct 15 | - third class assignment due |
| Oct 18 | - fourth class assignment due |
| Oct 25 | - Protege class assignment due |
| Nov 6 | - submit a table of contents and 300 word summary plus draft of associated ppt slides |
| Nov 17 | - submit penultimate draft of essay and powerpoint |
| Dec 4 | - submit final version of essay and powerpoint |
Grading
Grading will be based on two factors:
I: understanding and criticism of the videos presented in classes 1-13
All students are required to ingest the content of all videos and to take an active part in on-line discussions throughout the semester.
II: preparation of a youtube video and associated documentation (including powerpoint slides and essay).
Content and structure of the essay should be discussed with Dr Smith. Where the essay takes the form of the documentation of a specific ontology developed by the student it should include:
- Statement of scope of the ontology
- Summary of existing ontologies in the relevant domain
- Explanation of how your ontology differs from (or incorporates) these ontologies
- Screenshots of parts of the ontology with some examples of important terms and definitions
- Summaries of potential applications of the ontology
Grading Policy: Grading follows standard Graduate School policies. Grades will be weighted according to the following breakdown:
Weighting Assignment
- 26% - video summaries (2% per summary)
- 14% - forum participation
- 20% - youtube video
- 20% - powerpoint slides
- 20% - essay / ontology content
Final Grades
Grade Quality Percentage
| A | 4.0 | 93.0% -100.00% |
| A- | 3.67 | 90.0% - 92.9% |
| B+ | 3.33 | 87.0% - 89.9% |
| B | 3.00 | 83.0% - 86.9% |
| B- | 2.67 | 80.0% - 82.9% |
| C+ | 2.33 | 77.0% - 79.9% |
| C | 2.00 | 73.0% - 76.9% |
| C- | 1.67 | 70.0% - 72.9% |
| D+ | 1.33 | 67.0% - 69.9% |
| D | 1.00 | 60.0% - 66.9% |
| F | 0 | 59.9% or below |
An interim grade of Incomplete (I) may be assigned if the student has not completed all requirements for the course. An interim grade of 'I' shall not be assigned to a student who did not attend the course. The default grade accompanying an interim grade of 'I' shall be 'U' and will be displayed on the UB record as 'IU.' The default Unsatisfactory (U) grade shall become the permanent course grade of record if the 'IU' is not changed through formal notice by the instructor upon the student's completion of the course.
Assignment of an interim 'IU' is at the discretion of the instructor. A grade of 'IU' can be assigned only if successful completion of unfulfilled course requirements can result in a final grade better than the default 'U' grade. The student should have a passing average in the requirements already completed. The instructor shall provide the student specification, in writing, of the requirements to be fulfilled.
The university’s Graduate Incomplete Policy can be found here.
Related Policies and Services
Academic integrity is a fundamental university value. Through the honest completion of academic work, students sustain the integrity of the university while facilitating the university's imperative for the transmission of knowledge and culture based upon the generation of new and innovative ideas. See http://grad.buffalo.edu/Academics/Policies-Procedures/Academic-Integrity.html.
Accessibility resources: If you have any disability which requires reasonable accommodations to enable you to participate in this course, please contact the Office of Accessibility Resources in 60 Capen Hall, 645-2608 and also the instructor of this course during the first week of class. The office will provide you with information and review appropriate arrangements for reasonable accommodations, which can be found on the web here.
Attendance Policy
Students are expected to attend all lectures. For religious observances, university sanctioned events, athletic commitments and family/work obligations/emergencies, absences may be granted upon request but can have an effect on the finally obtained grade (see grading policy) For course cancellation/emergency planning, see the university website for cancellations/delays due to weather or other unforeseen events (http://emergency.buffalo.edu/campus-weather-alerts.html)
Classroom Decorum
Students are expected to arrive in due time for each class. Some lectures will start with a pre-lecture test to assess the student’s level of preparation for the class. This test contributes to the final grading. Use of cell phones and laptops is allowed for the purposes of the class, but not for private reasons. Phone calls are not allowed.
