Ontology Modules: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
(53 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The modules below are designed for use in teaching ontology to multidisciplinary audiences in domains such as government and administration, military and biomedical informatics. | The modules below are designed for use in teaching ontology to multidisciplinary audiences in domains such as government and administration, military and biomedical informatics. The content derives initially from the course "[http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Problems_in_Ontology PHI:531 Problems in Ontology"] taught in the University at Buffalo in the fall of 2012. However, it will be continually expanded and up-dated where necessary. | ||
---- | |||
Link to: [http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Streaming_Video_Ontology_Training_Courses Streaming Video Ontology Training Courses] | |||
== General Ontology == | |||
'''Introduction to Ontology''' | '''Barry Smith: Introduction to Ontology (2012)''' [http://org.buffalo.edu/Ontology_in_Buffalo_Aug_27_2012.ppt Slides] | ||
*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/1-Introduction-to-ontology.wmv Video] | |||
:Provides a basic introduction to ontology by addressing questions such as: What is an ontology? What are the differences and interrelations between ontology (philosophy), ontology (science), and ontology (engineering)? How are ontologies used? We will also provide an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), focusing on a discussion of the question: What is a musical score? | :Provides a basic introduction to ontology by addressing questions such as: What is an ontology? What are the differences and interrelations between ontology (philosophy), ontology (science), and ontology (engineering)? How are ontologies used? We will also provide an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), focusing on a discussion of the question: What is a musical score? | ||
''' | '''Werner Ceusters (Bioinformatics/Psychiatry): Particulars in Focus''' [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/sendfile/?file=20120910-OntologyClassOnReferentTracking.ppt Slides] | ||
*[https://buffalo.box.com/v/REFERENT-TRACKING Video] | |||
:Referent Tracking (RT) is a methodology to create digital copies of the parts of the world we are interested in. It is based on Basic Formal Ontology, but focuses on particulars rather than universals. The goal is to create information systems in such a way that (1) the information they contain mimics the structure of the corresponding portions of reality and (2) they can make optimal use of ontologies and terminologies. | :Referent Tracking (RT) is a methodology to create digital copies of the parts of the world we are interested in. It is based on Basic Formal Ontology, but focuses on particulars rather than universals. The goal is to create information systems in such a way that (1) the information they contain mimics the structure of the corresponding portions of reality and (2) they can make optimal use of ontologies and terminologies. | ||
''' | '''Basic Formal Ontology''' | ||
*[http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Basic_Formal_Ontology_2.0 Teaching material on Basic Formal Ontology]. | |||
*[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/ontologies.htm Introductory readings on General Ontology]. | |||
*[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/ Buffalo Ontology Site]. | |||
*[[2013 BFO Meeting]] | |||
*[ | |||
---- | |||
== Ontology of Mind == | |||
'''Mental Functioning Ontology''' | |||
* | :*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/3-Mental-functioning.wmv Video] | ||
'''[http://www.affective-sciences.org/user/346 Janna Hastings] (Swiss Center for Affective Sciences and European Bioinformatics Institute): Representing Mental Functioning''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/MFO-hastings.pptx Hastings Slides] | |||
[http:// | |||
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/ | |||
: | :Mental functioning includes all the faculties of the mind, e.g., perception, planning, language, memory, emotion, and self-representation. The study of these processes cuts across disciplines such as psychology, psychiatry, neuroscience, and biomedicine. The Mental Functioning Ontology (MFO) is designed to provide a means for the common description of data in all of these disciplines, in order to support data aggregation and comparison. For background material see [http://kr-med.org/icbofois2012/mfo/ here] (slides) and [http://kr-med.org/icbofois2012/proceedings/ICBOFOIS2012Workshops/ICBO2012MFO/ICBO-2012-MFO-WS.pdf here] (papers). | ||
'''Barry Smith: Mental Functioning and the Ontology of Language''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Mind&LanguageSep24_2012.pptx Slides] | |||
:Addresses those kinds of mental functioning which involve overt or covert use of language focusing especially on the issue of the directedness of thought and language to extra-mental objects. | |||
: | |||
'''Barry Smith: How To Do Things With Diagrams''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/How-to-do-things-with-diagrams-Sep25-2012.pptx Slides] | |||
*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/4-Diagrams.wmv Video] | |||
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaFnMesr6uQ Shorter Youtube Video] | |||
:Explores some of the ways in which the theory of speech acts can throw light on the role of diagrams and of diagrammatic symbologies in areas such as chess, music, chemistry and military planning. The ontology of processes and process representations plays a central role. | |||
* | |||
: | |||
'''Barry Smith: Ontology and the Austrian Tradition''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Mind&Language-1-Austria.pptx Slides] | |||
[ | *[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/5-MindandLanguage-1-Austria.wmv Video] | ||
:A discussion of the theory of intentionality (or the directedness of mental processes), and of the roots of this theory in the philosophy of the Brentano school in Austria. Continues the discussions initiated on September 24 of how mental processes are interrelated in different ways with linguistic processes (for example of speaking, reading, and silent siloloquy). | |||
'''Barry Smith: Mental Functioning Ontology and the ICF: A survey of the WHO's Internal Classification of Functioning''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Mind&Language-2-ICF.pptx Slides] | |||
*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/5-MindandLanguage-2-ICF.wmv Audio] - to be used together with slides [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Mind&Language-2-ICF.pptx here] | |||
: | |||
: | |||
'''Barry Smith: Neuroscience and the Ontology of Mind: A discussion of the mainstream neuroscience approach to mental directedness''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Mind&Language-3-Neuroscience.pptx Slides] | |||
* | *[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/5-MindandLanguage-3-Neuroscience.wmv Video] (for first five minutes see slides [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Mind&Language-3-Neuroscience.pptx here]) | ||
---- | |||
== Information Ontology == | |||
'''Alan Ruttenberg: The Basics of the Information Artifact Ontology''' | |||
* | *[https://ub.webex.com/ub/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=21913277&rKey=08e83d74bdf8a315 Raw Webex Video] | ||
:The Information Artifact Ontology (IAO) is an ontology of information entities, originally inspired by needs of the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations ([http://obi-ontology.org/page/Main_Page OBI]) to represent measurement data and other information entities associated with investigations such as reports and protocols. A number of issues that have emerged and we are developing a second version to address these issues. | |||
:Basic ideas: | |||
::1. information artifacts are about, or are intended to be about, some entity | |||
::2. genes are not information artifacts; gene sequences as recorded in computers are information artifacts | |||
::3. information artifacts are copyable | |||
::4. information artifacts are generically dependent continuants which have concretizations, for example in specifically dependent patterns of ink on a piece of paper or of magnetization on a hard drive. | |||
:Discussion: | |||
::How can we define the 'is about' relation, which forms the core of IAO? What is the current strategy, and what breaks? What can information artifacts be about? Non-problematic is the case of particulars. Can information artifacts be about types and if so, what does that mean? | |||
::What is a copying process - the process that results in a new concretization of an information content entity (ICE)? How is copying defined? Is there a constraint on how complicated the copying process can be it can be considered not as copying but as new creation? What happens when the copying is partial? | |||
::How should IAO deal with information artifacts for which the putative ''topic'' does not, or might not, exist? Examples are (written) hypotheses, fiction, diagrams of chemical compounds that can't be synthesized, terms such as 'ether' or 'phlogiston' from the history of science, terms such as 'the soup I plan to have for dinner' used in planning. | |||
::How can we define information artifacts in order to circumscribe the scope of IAO? What primitives do we need to rely on?Candidates include: intention, communication, (cognitive) mental function, output (of realization of cognitive mental function). | |||
::How do we deal with ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncategorematic_term syncategorematica]'' (for example the 'the' and the 'not' in 'the table not beside my bed')? | |||
::How do we deal with different encodings of what is putatively the same information artifact, for example resulting from use of different character sets such as ASCII or Unicode? | |||
:'''Background materials''' | :'''Background materials''' | ||
Line 111: | Line 86: | ||
*http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/From_BFO_to_IAO | *http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/From_BFO_to_IAO | ||
'''[http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/?page=ceusters_vita Werner Ceusters]: [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/sendfile/?file=or_submission_125_2.pdf Proposed Definitions of IAO Terms]''' | |||
'''[http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ron-rudnicki/4/b00/957 Ron Rudnicki] (CUBRC): [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/information-ontologies.pptx A Discussion of Two Information Ontologies]''' | |||
[https://ub.webex.com/ub/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=21963527&rKey=aa1c762058fff21e Raw Webex Video] | [https://ub.webex.com/ub/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=21963527&rKey=aa1c762058fff21e Raw Webex Video] | ||
---- | |||
== Ontology Evaluation == | |||
'''Fabian Neuhaus''' (National Institute of Standards and Technologies): Introduction to Ontology Evaluation [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Neuhaus-Evalution2012.pdf Slides] | |||
*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/Evaluation/Neuhaus.wmv Video] | |||
'''Barry Smith''': Basic Formal Ontology as a Tool for the Evaluation of Ontologies [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/HL7-and-BFO.pdf Paper] [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/HL7-BFO.ppt Slides] | |||
*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/Evaluation/Smith-HL7.wmv Video] | |||
:A Practical Example: Evaluation of the [http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/47171?p=terms HL7 RIM Ontology] | |||
:Relation to OntoClean | |||
:Alternatives to BFO | |||
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/medo/biodynamic.pdf Introduction to BFO] | |||
'''Werner Ceusters: A Realism-Based Approach to the Evaluation of Ontologies''' [http://www.referent-tracking.com/RTU/sendfile/?file=2012RBOntoEval.pptx Slides] | |||
*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/Evaluation/Ceusters.wmv Video] | |||
:We present a novel methodology for calculating the improvements obtained in successive versions of ontologies, using examples from biomedicine. The theory takes into account changes both in reality itself and in our understanding of this reality. The successful application of the theory rests on the willingness of ontology authors to document changes they make by following a number of simple rules. The theory provides a pathway by which ontology authoring can become a science rather than an art, following principles analogous to those that have fostered the growth of modern evidence-based medicine. Although in this paper we focus on ontologies, the methodology can be generalized to other sorts of terminology-based artifacts, including Electronic Patient Records. | |||
*[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/bfo/Versioning.pdf Paper] | |||
*[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/evaluation.html Background Readings on Ontology Evaluation] | |||
---- | |||
==Social Ontology == | |||
See [[Social Ontology 2012 | here]] | |||
---- | |||
== Biomedical Ontology == | |||
'''Alexander Diehl (Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo): From the Gene Ontology to the Neurological Disease Ontology''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/Diehl-GO-CL-ND.pptx Slides] | |||
*[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/7-GO.wmv Video] | |||
:The first part of the talk covers the Gene (GO) and Cell Ontologies (CL), covering issues of ontology structure, development, use in annotation, and exploitation for biological research. The second part will cover the Neurological Disease (ND) and Neuropsychological Testing Ontologies (NPT). | |||
* | *Background videos: | ||
* | *[http://southeastgenetics.org/presentation.php/20/How_to_Build_Useful_Ontologies_for_Clinical_and_Translational_Research Introduction to Biomedical Ontology]. | ||
*''' | *Background Reading''' | ||
: | :The Gene Ontology Consortium, "[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037419/ Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology]", Nat Genet. 2000 May; 25(1): 25–29. | ||
:[http://www. | :Mungall CJ, el al., "[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046410000171 Cross-product extensions of the Gene Ontology]", J Biomed Inform. 2011 Feb;44(1):80-6. | ||
:[http:// | :Hill DP, et al., "[http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/S5/S2 Gene Ontology annotations: what they mean and where they come from]", BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 29;9 Suppl 5:S2. | ||
:Meehan TF, et al., "[http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/6 Logical development of the cell ontology]", BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jan 5;12:6. | |||
:Cox AP, et al., "[http://bit.ly/T6TkZB Ontologies for the study of neurological disease]", ICBO 2012. | |||
:[http://www.everythingbio.com/glos/ Glossary of biological terms] | |||
: '''The Infectious Disease Ontology (IDO)''' | |||
*1.[http://code.google.com/p/ogms/ OGMS]: The Ontology for General Medical Science (Barry Smith) [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/OGMS-Nov2012.pptx Slides] | |||
:[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/8-OGMS-Nov2012.wmv Video] | |||
'''Lindsay Cowell (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center): The IDO Core and Its Extensions - Coordination and Interoperability''' [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/IDO_Nov-5.pdf Slides] | |||
:''' | *[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/8-IDO-Nov2012.wmv Video] | ||
'''Albert Goldfain: The IDO-Staph Extension [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/IDO-Staph.pptx Slides] | |||
* | *[http://mediastream.buffalo.edu/Content/research/phismith/Ontology2012/8-IDO-Staph-Nov2012.wmv Video] (for initial 10 minutes use slides from [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/12/IDO-Staph_.pptx here]) | ||
::''Staph aureus'' diseases and their differentiation | |||
::Antibiotic Resistance (Blocking, Complemenatary and Reciprocal Dispositions) (Albert Goldfain) | |||
::A Lattice of Staph aureus Infectious Diseases | |||
*Background Reading | |||
:[http://infectiousdiseaseontology.org/ IDO website] | |||
:LG Cowell, B Smith, "[http://www.springerlink.com/content/n2l5141m4306n8l0/fulltext.pdf Infectious Disease Ontology]", Chapter 19 in ''Infectious Disease Informatics'', V Sintchenko (ed.), 2010, 373-395. | |||
:A Goldfain, B Smith and LG Cowell, “[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/ido/Dispositions_and_IDO.pdf Dispositions and the Infectious Disease Ontology]”, in Antony Galton and Riichiro Mizoguchi (eds.), ''Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference'' (FOIS 2010), Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2010, 400-413. | |||
---- | |||
== Military Ontology == | |||
Video presentations on military ontology are provided [http://militaryontology.com/military-ontology-videos.html here]. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
== [[Ontological Engineering]] == | |||
Modules from Fall 2013 Graduate Seminar, Buffalo, NY | |||
== Military Intelligence Ontology== | |||
A tutorial on ontology for intelligence analysis is [http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_for_Intelligence,_Defense_and_Security here] | A tutorial on ontology for intelligence analysis is [http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_for_Intelligence,_Defense_and_Security here] | ||
Line 193: | Line 177: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== Ontology Software == | |||
Teaching material on ontology software is provided [http://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Prot%C3%A9g%C3%A9 here] | |||
Latest revision as of 22:39, 30 October 2022
The modules below are designed for use in teaching ontology to multidisciplinary audiences in domains such as government and administration, military and biomedical informatics. The content derives initially from the course "PHI:531 Problems in Ontology" taught in the University at Buffalo in the fall of 2012. However, it will be continually expanded and up-dated where necessary.
Link to: Streaming Video Ontology Training Courses
General Ontology
Barry Smith: Introduction to Ontology (2012) Slides
- Provides a basic introduction to ontology by addressing questions such as: What is an ontology? What are the differences and interrelations between ontology (philosophy), ontology (science), and ontology (engineering)? How are ontologies used? We will also provide an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), focusing on a discussion of the question: What is a musical score?
Werner Ceusters (Bioinformatics/Psychiatry): Particulars in Focus Slides
- Referent Tracking (RT) is a methodology to create digital copies of the parts of the world we are interested in. It is based on Basic Formal Ontology, but focuses on particulars rather than universals. The goal is to create information systems in such a way that (1) the information they contain mimics the structure of the corresponding portions of reality and (2) they can make optimal use of ontologies and terminologies.
Basic Formal Ontology
Ontology of Mind
Mental Functioning Ontology
Janna Hastings (Swiss Center for Affective Sciences and European Bioinformatics Institute): Representing Mental Functioning Hastings Slides
- Mental functioning includes all the faculties of the mind, e.g., perception, planning, language, memory, emotion, and self-representation. The study of these processes cuts across disciplines such as psychology, psychiatry, neuroscience, and biomedicine. The Mental Functioning Ontology (MFO) is designed to provide a means for the common description of data in all of these disciplines, in order to support data aggregation and comparison. For background material see here (slides) and here (papers).
Barry Smith: Mental Functioning and the Ontology of Language Slides
- Addresses those kinds of mental functioning which involve overt or covert use of language focusing especially on the issue of the directedness of thought and language to extra-mental objects.
Barry Smith: How To Do Things With Diagrams Slides
- Explores some of the ways in which the theory of speech acts can throw light on the role of diagrams and of diagrammatic symbologies in areas such as chess, music, chemistry and military planning. The ontology of processes and process representations plays a central role.
Barry Smith: Ontology and the Austrian Tradition Slides
- A discussion of the theory of intentionality (or the directedness of mental processes), and of the roots of this theory in the philosophy of the Brentano school in Austria. Continues the discussions initiated on September 24 of how mental processes are interrelated in different ways with linguistic processes (for example of speaking, reading, and silent siloloquy).
Barry Smith: Mental Functioning Ontology and the ICF: A survey of the WHO's Internal Classification of Functioning Slides
Barry Smith: Neuroscience and the Ontology of Mind: A discussion of the mainstream neuroscience approach to mental directedness Slides
Information Ontology
Alan Ruttenberg: The Basics of the Information Artifact Ontology
- The Information Artifact Ontology (IAO) is an ontology of information entities, originally inspired by needs of the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) to represent measurement data and other information entities associated with investigations such as reports and protocols. A number of issues that have emerged and we are developing a second version to address these issues.
- Basic ideas:
- 1. information artifacts are about, or are intended to be about, some entity
- 2. genes are not information artifacts; gene sequences as recorded in computers are information artifacts
- 3. information artifacts are copyable
- 4. information artifacts are generically dependent continuants which have concretizations, for example in specifically dependent patterns of ink on a piece of paper or of magnetization on a hard drive.
- Discussion:
- How can we define the 'is about' relation, which forms the core of IAO? What is the current strategy, and what breaks? What can information artifacts be about? Non-problematic is the case of particulars. Can information artifacts be about types and if so, what does that mean?
- What is a copying process - the process that results in a new concretization of an information content entity (ICE)? How is copying defined? Is there a constraint on how complicated the copying process can be it can be considered not as copying but as new creation? What happens when the copying is partial?
- How should IAO deal with information artifacts for which the putative topic does not, or might not, exist? Examples are (written) hypotheses, fiction, diagrams of chemical compounds that can't be synthesized, terms such as 'ether' or 'phlogiston' from the history of science, terms such as 'the soup I plan to have for dinner' used in planning.
- How can we define information artifacts in order to circumscribe the scope of IAO? What primitives do we need to rely on?Candidates include: intention, communication, (cognitive) mental function, output (of realization of cognitive mental function).
- How do we deal with syncategorematica (for example the 'the' and the 'not' in 'the table not beside my bed')?
- How do we deal with different encodings of what is putatively the same information artifact, for example resulting from use of different character sets such as ASCII or Unicode?
- Background materials
- http://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology/
- http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/From_BFO_to_IAO
Werner Ceusters: Proposed Definitions of IAO Terms
Ron Rudnicki (CUBRC): A Discussion of Two Information Ontologies
Ontology Evaluation
Fabian Neuhaus (National Institute of Standards and Technologies): Introduction to Ontology Evaluation Slides
Barry Smith: Basic Formal Ontology as a Tool for the Evaluation of Ontologies Paper Slides
- A Practical Example: Evaluation of the HL7 RIM Ontology
- Relation to OntoClean
- Alternatives to BFO
- Introduction to BFO
Werner Ceusters: A Realism-Based Approach to the Evaluation of Ontologies Slides
- We present a novel methodology for calculating the improvements obtained in successive versions of ontologies, using examples from biomedicine. The theory takes into account changes both in reality itself and in our understanding of this reality. The successful application of the theory rests on the willingness of ontology authors to document changes they make by following a number of simple rules. The theory provides a pathway by which ontology authoring can become a science rather than an art, following principles analogous to those that have fostered the growth of modern evidence-based medicine. Although in this paper we focus on ontologies, the methodology can be generalized to other sorts of terminology-based artifacts, including Electronic Patient Records.
Social Ontology
See here
Biomedical Ontology
Alexander Diehl (Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo): From the Gene Ontology to the Neurological Disease Ontology Slides
- The first part of the talk covers the Gene (GO) and Cell Ontologies (CL), covering issues of ontology structure, development, use in annotation, and exploitation for biological research. The second part will cover the Neurological Disease (ND) and Neuropsychological Testing Ontologies (NPT).
- Background videos:
- Background Reading
- The Gene Ontology Consortium, "Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology", Nat Genet. 2000 May; 25(1): 25–29.
- Mungall CJ, el al., "Cross-product extensions of the Gene Ontology", J Biomed Inform. 2011 Feb;44(1):80-6.
- Hill DP, et al., "Gene Ontology annotations: what they mean and where they come from", BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 29;9 Suppl 5:S2.
- Meehan TF, et al., "Logical development of the cell ontology", BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jan 5;12:6.
- Cox AP, et al., "Ontologies for the study of neurological disease", ICBO 2012.
- Glossary of biological terms
- The Infectious Disease Ontology (IDO)
Lindsay Cowell (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center): The IDO Core and Its Extensions - Coordination and Interoperability Slides
Albert Goldfain: The IDO-Staph Extension Slides
- Staph aureus diseases and their differentiation
- Antibiotic Resistance (Blocking, Complemenatary and Reciprocal Dispositions) (Albert Goldfain)
- A Lattice of Staph aureus Infectious Diseases
- Background Reading
- IDO website
- LG Cowell, B Smith, "Infectious Disease Ontology", Chapter 19 in Infectious Disease Informatics, V Sintchenko (ed.), 2010, 373-395.
- A Goldfain, B Smith and LG Cowell, “Dispositions and the Infectious Disease Ontology”, in Antony Galton and Riichiro Mizoguchi (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (FOIS 2010), Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2010, 400-413.
Military Ontology
Video presentations on military ontology are provided here.
Ontological Engineering
Modules from Fall 2013 Graduate Seminar, Buffalo, NY
Military Intelligence Ontology
A tutorial on ontology for intelligence analysis is here
Ontology Software
Teaching material on ontology software is provided here