Enhanced Object-Based Production Conference: Difference between revisions

From NCOR Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
== Schedule of Topics and Speakers ==
== Schedule of Topics and Speakers ==


Date: TBD
**The final schedule and list of speakers will be confirmed soon.**




<u>'''Day One: Referent Tracking and Object Based Production</u>'''
Confirmed Speakers:
 
 
9:00am '''Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (ISO/IEC 21838-2) and Referent Tracking'''


Barry Smith, Director, National Center for Ontological Research (NCOR)
Barry Smith, Director, National Center for Ontological Research (NCOR)
9:40am '''Using the Common Core Ontologies'''
Ron Rudnicki, Senior Ontologist, CUBRC
10:30am BREAK
10:45am '''Introduction to Defense Ontologies'''


Forrest B. Hare, SAIC Fellow, Solutions Architect, Cyberspace Operation, SAIC
Forrest B. Hare, SAIC Fellow, Solutions Architect, Cyberspace Operation, SAIC
11:15am '''Object Based Production and Living Intelligence'''
Geoff X. Davis,  Program Team Lead, Analytics and Simulation, SAIC
12:00pm LUNCH
1:00pm '''Recording Reality Using Referent Tracking'''


Werner Ceusters, Division Chief, Biomedical Ontology, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo
Werner Ceusters, Division Chief, Biomedical Ontology, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo
Line 54: Line 32:
William Hogan, Professor, Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida
William Hogan, Professor, Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida


 
David Limbaugh, Ontologist, CUBRC
3:10pm BREAK
 
 
3:25pm '''Referent Tracking Theory Applied to Object Based Production'''
 
David Limbaugh, Intelligence Community Postdoc, University at Buffalo
 
Alan Ruttenberg, Director of Clinical and Translational Data Exchange, University at Buffalo


Timothy Lebo, Cyber Operations Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory
Timothy Lebo, Cyber Operations Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory
Nicholas Del Rio, Command and Control Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory
Thursday, May 14, 2020
<u>'''Day Two: Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry</u>'''
9am – 12:00pm
Purpose: The Intelligence Community Ontology Foundry initiative is an effort to create a governing body that would be responsible for curating a collection of upper- and mid-level ontologies used to tag data in the defense and intelligence domains. The goal of this session is to continue work on the ICOF initiative by discussing how it contributes to the semantic foundation for Referent Tracking and Object Based Production.


== Conference Description ==
== Conference Description ==

Revision as of 17:40, 13 February 2023


Event Date and Venue

June 12-14, 2023

Schedule and Venue TBD

Conference Goal

This conference aims (1) to identify the lessons learned from the Referent Tracking methodology, (2) to explore how these lessons might be translated to the domains of the defense and intelligence communities, (3) to identify potential benefits relating to semantic technology, and (4) to explore how these benefits can enhance OBP.

Organizer and Contact

For information contact:

Amelia Kahn arkahn@buffalo.edu

Schedule of Topics and Speakers

    • The final schedule and list of speakers will be confirmed soon.**


Confirmed Speakers:


Barry Smith, Director, National Center for Ontological Research (NCOR)

Forrest B. Hare, SAIC Fellow, Solutions Architect, Cyberspace Operation, SAIC

Werner Ceusters, Division Chief, Biomedical Ontology, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo

William Hogan, Professor, Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida

David Limbaugh, Ontologist, CUBRC

Timothy Lebo, Cyber Operations Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory

Conference Description

This conference aims (1) to identify the lessons learned from the Referent Tracking methodology, (2) to explore how these lessons might be translated to the domains of the defense and intelligence communities, (3) to identify potential benefits relating to semantic technology, and (4) to explore how these benefits can enhance OBP.

The Problem: Ever increasing quantities of disaggregated data pose a problem for intelligence analysis. The problem is magnified when much of the data is sparse, obscure, or ever-changing. A key contributor to this problem is the inconsistency of data management policies. Mutually incompatible data management solutions have been and continue to be adopted not only by organizations but also by different departments within organizations. Data, as a result, is difficult to aggregate, and difficult to discover and to interpret, sometimes even difficult to interpret by those who created the data in the first place. This problem of too-much data inconsistently handled has an analogue in medicine in the realm of patient data. Electronic Health Records, for example, are collections of data about patients which grow and change in ways which make it difficult to track the medical state of a patient as it changes over time, for example as patients move between hospitals.

The Research: Intelligence data is useful only if it is available to decision makers when they need it. The subject of this conference is an Intelligence Community (IC) inter-organizational data architecture that has the potential to rapidly handle the enormous amounts of data collected continuously by the IC. The data architecture –– called ‘Enhanced Object-Based Production’ (E-OBP) –– is based on the Referent Tracking (RT) approach developed and tested in the medical domain over some 15 years [1]. E-OBP takes the object-oriented approach of Object-Based Production (OBP) but expands ‘object’ to any salient portion of reality. This allows traditional OBP to be transformed into an expressive, flexible, and scalable, data architecture.

The governing principle of E-OBP is to structure data that objectively mirrors reality in a way that allows tracking. Reality is made of unique entities with shared features and relationships indexed to locations and times. E-OBP uses 1) unique identifiers to refer to unique entities, 2) terms from a controlled vocabulary to represent features, relationships, times, and places, and 3) time-indexed, first-order logic expressible, assertions to represent when an entity has some feature or some relationship to other entities.

E-OBP applies not only to data about first-order reality – tanks, people, missions, economic transactions, and so on – but also to data about these data, which it tracks using the same information infrastructure. It tracks when data become available, who made it available, the methods by which it was obtained, and whether it should be trusted [2]. It also records when data is discovered to be inaccurate, in a way that allows for more sophisticated error tracking. All of these data are brought together by the system to form a gigantic evolving graph, which forms a comprehensive and continuously adjusted picture of reality structured to allow zooming on identified threats, sensitive areas, government actions, and so forth.

Participants

TBA