Joint Doctrine Ontology: Difference between revisions
m (→Planning) |
m (→Planning) |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
== Planning == | == Planning == | ||
[http://www.imse.iastate.edu/dorneich/files/2013/02/2010_KSCO_ITA_Planning.pdf Making Plans Alive] | |||
[https://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/7f55b167-54e8-4104-814b-c888d5d53113/NWC-2061D-GEF-JSCP-APEX-Dec-2013-CHG-1.aspx APEX and GFM] | [https://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/7f55b167-54e8-4104-814b-c888d5d53113/NWC-2061D-GEF-JSCP-APEX-Dec-2013-CHG-1.aspx APEX and GFM] |
Revision as of 18:14, 16 August 2015
Joint Doctrine Ontology Project
Goal
The goal of this project is to create a formal representation of the content of (selected parts of) Doctrine that is designed to help
- understand logically how different parts of doctrine interact
- visualize how different parts of doctrine interact
- understand dependences between definitions,
- ensure that changes in definitions cascade appropriately through all dependent definitions
- enabling more efficient web access to and discovery of doctrinal knowledge and definitions of a sort that will facilitate greater coordination of training and operations particular as these involve IT systems working alongside human beings.
The project is directed by Barry Smith, whose work is carried out under two Rome Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) projects "MAMA" and "Living Plan". The project has the support of Lt Col James McArthur, Chief, Joint Doctrine Division, J-7, Joint Staff.
The project will begin with a small number of modules focusing on:
- 1. Capstone (Task, Function and Mission) (JP 1)
- 2. Planning (JP 5-0)
- 3. Civil Operations (JP 3-57)
- 4. Space Operations (JP 3-14)
- TBD: Operational Environment
- TBD: Transport (4-01)
Initially we are focusing on
- A. review of existing definitions to identify and fix logical errors.
- B. exploring the role of Joint Doctrine and more specific doctrinal publications (for example the relation between the Joint Dictionary (JP 1-02) and the Army Doctrine Reference Publication 1-02, or between Joint Planning and Airforce Planning ([1])
Issues to be addressed:
- Relation to existing efforts, especially:
- The role of ontology fragments to be reused in different areas of doctrine, for example pertaining to PMESII-PT
Background Information on Joint Doctrine
DoD Dictionary of Military Terms
Joint Doctrine, Joint Terminology Program, and DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5025. 12: Standardization of Military and Associated Terminology
Universal Joint Task List (UJTL)
Joint Doctrine Development Process
Related Efforts
Acquisition Community Connection
U.S. Army Unified Land Operations, with Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP) 1-02: Operational Terms and Military Symbol
National Information Exchange Model (NIEM)
Joint Information Environment (JIE)
DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF)
Data Services Environnent (DSE): DoDI 8320.02, “Sharing Data, Information, and Information Technology (IT) Services in the Department of Defense.”
Global Force Management (GFM)
Based on the authoritative guidance in the following issuances:
- DoD Manual (DoDM) 8260.03, Volume 1: The Global Force Management Data Initiative (GFM DI) Implementation: Unique Identification (UID) for GFM
- DoDM 8260.03 Volume 2: Global Force Management Data Initiative (GFM DI) Implementation: The Organizational and Force Structure Construct (OFSC)
Planning
The Downfall of Adaptive Planning
Thomas Cleary, Military Decision Making Process: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
Introduction to Plans and Orders
A Computational Framework for Living Plan Specification, Execution and Evaluation
PLANET: A Shareable and Reusable Ontology for Representing Plans