2013 BFO Meeting

Venue: Ramada Inn, Amherst, NY 14051

Date: May 13-14, 2013.

This meeting is co-located with the PRO-PO-GO meeting, to be held on May 15-16, 2013.

Goal

The goal of the meeting is to assess the current state of the BFO 2.0 Specification and to consider proposals regarding BFO 2.0 OWL. As the OWL working group formally decided not to meet at this time, work on BFO 2.0 OWL will contribute to subsequent meetings of this group, but decisions that require vote will not be taken.

Draft Schedule

Monday, May 13, 2013

11:30 Registration and Lunch

12:30 The BFO 2.0 Specification

1. Brief introduction (Barry Smith)

2. Role of BFO 2.0 Specification in relation to BFO 2.0 FOL, CLIF and OWL

3. Report on semi-automatic conversion of BFO from v1.1 to v2.0 (Zheng)

4. Reports from current users of BFO 2.0

CHEBI's experience with BFO 2.0 (Hastings)

Experiences with BFO 2.0 in developing the Neurological Disease Ontology (Cox, Diehl, Jensen)

14:30 Break

5. Issues with the Specification, especially as concerns

• Need for a shorter and more user-friendly version
• Process profiles
• Granularity
• Exists-at-t'
• Rigid vs. non-rigid types
• BFO and range of IAO:aboutness

See also list here

18:00 Dinner

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

9:00 BFO 2.0 FOL (Dipert)

10:30 Break

11:00 BFO 2.0 OWL

Issues with the BFO 2.0 OWL version

including the treatment of time and relations in BFO 2.0 OWL

12:30 Lunch

13:00 Issues with the BFO 2.0 OWL version (continued)

14:30 Break

15:00 Spatial Relations

BFO and anatomy

location

fiat boundary

holes

16:30 Plans to create a paper on BFO

18:00 Dinner

Background Reading

The current draft version of the BFO 2.0 Specification is available here.

For further information please write to Barry Smith or see here.

For introductory reading see: Pierre Grenon and Barry Smith: "SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology", Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4 (2004), 69-103.

For introductory reading on relations see: Barry Smith, Werner Ceusters, et al., “Relations in Biomedical Ontologies”, Genome Biology (2005), 6 (5), R46.

For discussion of core BFO issues see: Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters, “Ontological Realism as a Methodology for Coordinated Evolution of Scientific Ontologies”, Applied Ontology, 5 (2010), 139–188.

The paper here contains some material pertaining to process profiles: “Classifying Processes: An Essay in Applied Ontology”, Ratio, in press.

And the paper here contains material on the proposed BFO 2.0 classification of objects: “On Classifying Material Entities in Basic Formal Ontology”, in Interdisciplinary Ontology. Proceedings of the Third Interdisciplinary Ontology Meeting, Tokyo: Keio University Press, 2012, 1-13.

Participants

Judith Blake (Jackson Lab)

Matthias Brochhausen (Arkansas)

Werner Ceusters (Buffalo)

Alexander Cox (Buffalo)

Alex Diehl (Buffalo)

Randall Dipert (Buffalo)

Bill Duncan (Buffalo)

Janna Hastings (EBI / Geneva)

William Hogan (Arkansas)

Leonard Jacuzzo (Buffalo)

Mark Jensen (Buffalo)

Tatiana Malyuta (CUNY)

Darren Natale (Georgetown)

Fabian Neuhaus (NIST)

James Overton (Toronto)

Alan Ruttenberg (Buffalo)

Stefan Schulz (Medical University of Graz)

Selja Seppälä (Buffalo)

Barry Smith (Buffalo)

Jie Zheng (Penn)