Top Level Ontology 10-21-2016: Difference between revisions
From NCOR Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Outlines the draft document and describes implications for BFO. Copies of this draft are available from BS on request. [http://ncor.buffalo.edu/2016/TLO-meeting/Comments-on-TLO-Working-Draft-Oct21-2016.pptx Slides] | :Outlines the draft document and describes implications for BFO. Copies of this draft are available from BS on request. [http://ncor.buffalo.edu/2016/TLO-meeting/Comments-on-TLO-Working-Draft-Oct21-2016.pptx Slides] | ||
4pm Michael Gruninger (Toronto): '''A Sideways Look at Upper Ontologies | 4pm Michael Gruninger (Toronto): '''A Sideways Look at Upper Ontologies''' | ||
:Within the applied ontology community, upper ontologies are widely recognized as tools to support the tasks of ontology design and semantic integration. This talk will explore an alternative vision for upper ontologies which is effective at facilitating the sharability and reusability of ontologies. The notion of generic ontologies is characterized through the formalization of ontological commitments and choices. Ontology repositories are used to modularize ontologies so that any particular upper ontology is equivalent to the union of a set of generic ontologies. In this way, upper ontologies are not replaced but rather integrated with other theories in the ontology repository. The talk concludes with a discussion of work with Lydia Silva-Munoz on the axiomatization of the SUMO time ontology. [http://ncor.buffalo.edu/2016/TLO-meeting/sideways-talk.pdf Slides 1] [http://ncor.buffalo.edu/2016/TLO-meeting/Silva-Munoz_Gruninger_sumo_time_fois.pdf Slides 2] | :Within the applied ontology community, upper ontologies are widely recognized as tools to support the tasks of ontology design and semantic integration. This talk will explore an alternative vision for upper ontologies which is effective at facilitating the sharability and reusability of ontologies. The notion of generic ontologies is characterized through the formalization of ontological commitments and choices. Ontology repositories are used to modularize ontologies so that any particular upper ontology is equivalent to the union of a set of generic ontologies. In this way, upper ontologies are not replaced but rather integrated with other theories in the ontology repository. The talk concludes with a discussion of work with Lydia Silva-Munoz on the axiomatization of the SUMO time ontology. [http://ncor.buffalo.edu/2016/TLO-meeting/sideways-talk.pdf Slides 1] [http://ncor.buffalo.edu/2016/TLO-meeting/Silva-Munoz_Gruninger_sumo_time_fois.pdf Slides 2] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:50, 27 October 2016
Ontology Group Meeting, October 21, 2016
2pm John Beverley (UB): Modularization and Verification of the Basic Formal Ontology 2.0
- Describes the on-going project to create a first-order logical axiomatization of BFO. Slides
3pm Barry Smith (UB): Proposed ISO Top Level Ontology Standard
- Outlines the draft document and describes implications for BFO. Copies of this draft are available from BS on request. Slides
4pm Michael Gruninger (Toronto): A Sideways Look at Upper Ontologies
- Within the applied ontology community, upper ontologies are widely recognized as tools to support the tasks of ontology design and semantic integration. This talk will explore an alternative vision for upper ontologies which is effective at facilitating the sharability and reusability of ontologies. The notion of generic ontologies is characterized through the formalization of ontological commitments and choices. Ontology repositories are used to modularize ontologies so that any particular upper ontology is equivalent to the union of a set of generic ontologies. In this way, upper ontologies are not replaced but rather integrated with other theories in the ontology repository. The talk concludes with a discussion of work with Lydia Silva-Munoz on the axiomatization of the SUMO time ontology. Slides 1 Slides 2
