Applied Ontology

Title: PHI 549 Applied Ontology, Spring 2017

Faculty: Barry Smith Tutorial on Basic Formal Ontology Registration: Class# 24197. Registration details for off-campus students are provided under Part Time/Graduate here.

Course Structure: This will be a three credit hour on-line graduate seminar. It will be taught through the medium of a series of 2-hour long videos incorporating presentation of powerpoint slides and question-answer sessions. Links to videos will be distributed according to the schedule below. The final session will consist be structured around youtube videos created by the students in the class.

Course Description: An ontology is a structured collection of terms used to tag data with the goal of making data deriving from heterogeneous sources more easily searchable, comparable or combinable. Ontologies allow information to be shared across communities of scientists with different sorts of expertise. The Gene Ontology, for example, allows researchers on aging to use data from cell biology, yeast biology, cancer biology, genetics, and gerontology, because all of these disciplines create data that are tagged using Gene Ontology terms. The course will provide an introduction to ontology from an application oriented point of view, focusing on the best practices for ontology development and on the development of plug-and-play ontology modules for re-use in different areas. Examples will be drawn primarily from biology and medicine, but no expertise in this disciplines is presupposed.

Schedule The link to the course video for any given week will be provided at 9am on the corresponding Sunday (as listed below). Students are required to watch the video within 48 hours of this posting. Class participants are required to post to the class email forum questions, responses and discussion comments relating to the video from the relevant week.

---

January 29: Introduction to Ontology

Video Slides

• A brief history of ontology
• Semantically enhanced publishing
• GO: The most successful ontology thus far
• Aristotle's Metaphysics and Categories
• The Ontological Square
• Granular partitions
• Aristotle vs. Kant

Ontology and Logic Video Slides

• David Armstrong's Spreadsheet Ontology
• Fantology: The error of assuming that logic ('F(a)') is the guide to ontological form
• The confusion of universals and properties
• Universals and the Boolean organization of the world of classes
• First order logic with universal terms (FOLWUT)

---

February 5: The Ontology of Social Reality

Video Slides

• Speech acts
• The money in your bank account
• War and chess
• Debts
• Institutions
• Searle's naturalism and its problems
• Objects vs. representations
• Hernando de Soto and The Mystery of Capital
• Ontology of the credit crunch

Why I Am No Longer a Philosopher (or: Ontology Leaving the Mother Ship of Philosophy) Video Slides

• How psychology became a scientific discipline independent of philosophy in the 19th century
• Reasons for founding a new discipline The rise of ontology as an independent discipline
• Research centers, funding, methods, journals, peer review, national and international conferences, teaching
• Practical applications of ontology
• Typical results of the founding of a new discipline
• Towards a career path for ontologists

---

February 12: Why Computer Science Needs Philosophy

Video,Slides

• Today's information-driven science faces a vast new problem of data unification
• In medicine, this problem can be of life-and-death significance
• The organization that is HL7
• Ontology 101: Why computer-science ontology needs common sense
• Does France exist?
• Why computer scientists prefer a view of ontology as conceptual modeling
• The alternative: scientific ontologies
• Towards ontology (science)

Ontology and the Semantic Web Video, Slides

• Examples of Semantic Web ontologies
• Simple syllogisms and beyond
• Problems with XML
• Clay Shirky: Why the Semantic Web would be a utopia
• Blooming 'lite' ontologies
• Why ontology requires thinking
• To move in the right direction, the Semantic Web needs (inter alia) a guiding upper level ontology
• CYC, SUMO, DOLCE, BFO

---

Feb 19: Towards a Standard Upper Level Ontology

Video, Slides

• Scientific ontologies have special features
• Building scientific ontologies which work together demands a common set of ontological relations
• Basic Formal Ontology: benefits of coordination
• Users of BFO
• Continuants, occurrents, realizables
• Specific dependence, generic dependence, information artifacts
• Dispositions, roles, functions
• Diseases and disorders: the Ontology of General Medical Science

The Universal Core: Ontology and the US Federal Government Data Integration Initiative Video, Slides, Reading

• The DoD Net-Centric Data Strategy
• The Universal Core (UCore) Taxonomy and Semantic Layer
• Reasoning with OWL DL
• Managing extension ontologies
• Example: Command and Control
• Information entities
• The UCore change management process
• How UCore SL helps

---

Feb 26: Simple Protege Introduction

Videos

• When watching these videos please bear in mind that we have not introduced in the class so far the specific terminology used by Protege. Most importantly, 'class' in Sadawi's course is what we have been referring to as 'type' or 'universal'. 'Property' is what we have been referring to as 'Relation'. Each property has a domain and a range; for instance the property teaches has the domain teacher and the range student. A guide (probably more than you need) is here and there is also an introduction to the Semantic Web in the Appendix to the BFO book. If there is terminology used in Sadawi's lectures which you think needs explaining please feel free to post a request to the the class email list [1].
• In addition to taking Sadawi's course you should also download Protege to your computer from here and experiment with creating simple ontologies of your own and posting them to the web. Include links on the slack page to the ontologies you create.

---

Mar 5: Ontology and Referent Tracking

Video

• This video presents a set of rules and best practices for ontology creation, together with examples
• The three videos below introduce the idea of referent tracking. Where ontologies are descriptions of types (universals and defined classes in reality), a referent tracking system provides a way of referring to and keeping track of the instances of such types. Ontologies and referent tracking systems are thus two sides of a single kind.
• A referent system (RTS) is designed not merely to keep track of what is the case in reality but also to allow us to capture what is believed to be the case in reality. It also allows us to keep track of how changes in the information system correspond to changes in the reality outside that system. We will provide an introduction to referent tracking and its implementations.

Basics of Referent Tracking (RT) Video

RT and Video Surveillance Video

RT and Data descriptions Video

• Reading: How to track absolutely everything?. Note that each time your download this pdf file the copy you create is assigned a new referent tracking ID. This enables Dr Ceusters to keep track of the IP addresses of those who are downloading materials from his site and of which versions of these materials they are downloading at which times.

---

Mar 12: Basic Formal Ontology

The video material for the period from March 12 through March 26 will cover Basic Formal Ontology as described in the book and in the more technical specification here.

BFO Part One: Overview of BFO

Slides

What BFO is used for

BFO is an upper-level ontology

Ontological realism: an evidence-based strategy for ontology development

Starting point for downward population

Annotation of scientific and administrative data

Part storehouse of lessons learned, part QWERTY keyboard

Basis for common training

Works best under the hood

Brief history of BFO

Pre-History

Aristotle's Ontological Square

Edmund Husserl

Truthmakers

The Naive Physics Manifesto

Mereotopology

The Gene Ontology and the Foundational Model of Anatomy

BFO's competitors

DOLCE

SUMO

CYC

What BFO, DOLCE, SUMO, CYC have in common

Arguments in favor of using BFO

Important users of BFO

OBO Foundry

NIF Standard

OBI

IDO Consortium

Plant Ontology

Universal Core Semantic Layer

How BFO is constructed and maintained

Conservative evolution

Simplicity (two levels; no qualities of qualities)

Strict formality (no overlap with domain ontologies)

Asserted monohierarchy and inferred polyhierarchy

Truthmaker

Non-multiplicative (the statue is the portion of clay during the time when the latter has a certain role)

Perspectivalism

No reductionism, no phenomenalism

No 'context'

No meanings, fictions, non-existents

The Semiotic Triangle

No 'possible worlds'

No abstracta

How to deal with thoughts, beliefs, information artifacts

Overview of BFO 1.0

Instances and universals

Continuants and occurrents

Dependent entities and independent entities

PATO qualities

Different kinds of relations

Symmetry, asymmetry and inverses

The all-some rule

What to do with probabilistic and other some-some relations?

Realizables

Roles

Dispositions and the treatment of modality

Functions

Added in BFO 1.1

Generically and specifically dependent continuants, concretizations, and relations of dependence

Information entities

A shorter summary of the March 12-26 material is presented here:

BFO 2.0 Shorter Version Part One

BFO 2.0 Shorter Version Part Two

---

Mar 19 Spring Recess

Mar 26 Basic Formal Ontology (Continued)

Slides

BFO Part Two: Varieties of continuant entities

Boundaries, sites and spatial regions

Material entities occupy spatial regions

Temporal instants and temporal intervals

Spatial boundaries and spatial volumes

Time, space and coordinate frames

Material and immaterial entities

Objects, fiat object parts and object aggregates

Three kinds of objects

Organisms

Solid portions of matter

Engineered artifacts

A problem case: Cell adhesion

Fiat objects reflect granular partitions

Object aggregates reflect granular partitions

Organisms and molecules

Object aggregates can change their members over time

Rigid and non-rigid universals

Determinates and determinables

Role universals are rigid universals

BFO Part Three: Process Profiles

Process profiles as targets of process measurements

Temperature charts

Cognitive selection

The Wiggers diagram

Quality process profiles

Color

Hue, saturation and brightness

Polyphonic music

Determinables and determinates

Rate process profiles

Heart rate

Speed

Relative Process profiles

Process profiles and time-series graphs

Truthmakers for graphs

April 2: Basic Formal Ontology (Continued)

BFO Part Four: Granular Partitions

Slides

Manipulating partitions

Object partitions

Quality partitions

Color

Map layers

Process partitions

Map-based partitions of occurrent reality and the fiat entities they create

Weather

Napoleon's march to Moscow

From photography to film

Persistence in time

Partition sequences

Tossing a coin

Chess

Flying from Vienna to New York

Molecular pathways

Defining 'process profile'

Focusing on the cello part when you listen to a string quartet

Granular partitions and the Davidsonian theory of events

Quantities as Fiat Universals

Slides

Granular partitions are systems of cells which are projected on corresponding portions of reality. Maps of the territorial dioceses and archdioceses of the Catholic Church of the United States, for example, are granular partitions of a certain area of land. The former stands to the latter in the relation of refinement. Some granular partitions reflect bona fide divisions of reality, for example between mammals and reptiles. Others, for example, between normal and elevated blood pressure, represent reality in terms of fiat demarcations introduced for diagnostic or other purposes. This talk applies the theory of granular partitions to our understanding of quantities and of units of measure.

Apr 9: Environments and Emotions

Environments: Inside and Outside the Organism Slides

The talk begins with the question: What is an environment? Environments fall outside traditional philosophical classifications since they are neither things nor events. The Environment Ontology proposes a new approach to the understanding of environments grounded in the science of ecology, and considering environments within the same family as niches, habitats, and biomes. The talk concludes with a discussion of the relationship between the ontology of biological environments and the idea of environment underlying the ecological psychology of J. J. Gibson and the theory of behavior settings put forward by Roger Barker.

The Emotion Ontology Slides

The scientific study of emotions utilizes data of a wide range of different sorts, ranging from introspective and observational reports of individual emotional experiences to experimental data deriving from chemical, genetic, and neurological studies. Scientific ontologies provide a strategy for the integration of such heterogeneous data by providing formal definitions of the types of entities in the corresponding domains of reality and a controlled vocabulary in whose terms the different sorts of data can be consistently described. Heretofore, there has been little effort directed towards such formal representation for emotional phenomena, in part because of widespread debates within the affective science community on matters of definition and categorization. The Emotion Ontology is an attempt to rectify this shortfall. I will describe the ontology and show how it interoperates with ontologies in neighboring areas such as neurochemistry. I will also draw some general conclusions pertaining to classification in psychological and psychiatric domains, to the treatment of grief, and to the relation of all of the above to questions of philosophy.

Apr 16: The Ontology of Social Reality (continued)

How To Do Things With Diagrams Slides

Diagrams can be used to support a variety of different sorts of activites. We propose an analogy between uses of diagrams and uses of words in different sorts of speech acts. We illustrate this analogy with a variety of examples from the realm of cartography, architectural planning, and musical performance. We conclude with a discussion of Bratman and Shapiro on social action, pointing to the role of diagrams in bringing about the coordination of actions of different groups of human beings involved in shared agency.

Commanding and Other Social Acts Slides

We begin by distinguishing speech acts from document acts, where the latter includes not only for example signing or stamping or filling in a paper document but also including the acts performed, for instance, when you are completing and submitting your tax forms using tax software. We refer to the latter as e-document acts. Planning, and especially military planning, is nowadays a matter of both paper document acts and e-document acts. Successful military planning requires that there be pre-defined types of actions which planners can incorporate into their plans. Planners must be confident that warfighters will be able to execute actions of these types in an effective way. We show how this confidence is achieved 1. through military doctrine -- which defines the relevant action types -- and 2. through military training -- which builds the warfighters who can execute them. Military plans, military doctrine and military training relate not only to the actions of individual warfighters, but also to team actions and to the sorts of team of team actions involved when entire armies are involved in military options. It is the role of military command to make this possible -- we plan team actions by planning the individual actions of commanders at different levels in the military hierarchy. The speech acts and document acts we call military commands thus occur in the typical case as part of the execution of military plans. We conclude with a comparison between the planning, training, and commanding on the side of the military with the orchestration, rehearsal, and conducting that takes place in the performance of symphonic music.

The Ontology of Terrorism Slides

Notoriously, intelligence agencies face the problem of Connecting the Dots. 'Connecting', here, means not only cross-identifying the individuals referred to in different sources, but also combining in useful ways all the data about such individuals. Ontologies allow analysts to harvest combinable information from messy inputs by providing consistent sets of terms for describing the entities involved. Suppose, for example, that ontology terms have been used to tag collections of heterogeneous source data about, say, persons in Baghdad. Analysts can then use the results to identify all available data regarding, say, persons who speak Armenian, or persons with expertise in Java programming; and they can do this independently of the type of data (text, images, audio)which served as inputs. To be effective, however, ontologies need to contain not just terms but also definitions. To illustrate how this works we will consider some simple examples of ontology building, concluding with an ontological approach to the definition of terrorism.

Apr 23: The Ontology of Social Reality (continued)

Ontology of Obligations

Ontology of the Organigram

Apr 30: Ontology of Medicine

The Glory and Misery of Electronic Health Records

May 7 Student video presentations

Example Ontologies

Information Artifact Ontology

Gene Ontology

OBO (Open Biomedical Ontologies) Foundry

The Environment Ontology

Ontology for General Medical Science

Text: Robert Arp, Barry Smith and Andrew Spear, Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, August 2015

Further readings are provided here: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/

Requirements: This course is open to all persons with an undergraduate degree and some relevant experience (for example in data scientists, information engineers, terminology researchers). No prior knowledge of ontology is required. In order to receive a grade and course credit students will be required to have reviewed in a timely manner all provided videos and any accompanying recommended reading. Grading will be on the basis of contributions to the on-line class discussion forum and on the quality and content of a 20 minute youtube video (with accompanying essay and powerpoint slide deck) on some topic in the field of applied ontology. Each student will be required to create one such video for presentation in the final class session on May 8. Examples of student videos created in comparable classes in the past are available here and here.

• Your video should be 20 minutes long; it will be graded on the basis of clarity and force of argument, interestingness of content, and quality of delivery.
• The video should be based on a powerpoint presentation of approximately 20 slides. The slides should provide a minimal amount of text (using 30 point font or above), together with accompanying graphics, for example charts representing data. You should not read the slides -- rather, you should use the slides as summaries of the successive points you want to make, and present these points ex tempore.
• The video should be accompanied by an essay presenting the points you make and providing literature references, the whole amounting to at least 3000 words. A short draft of your essay should be submitted to Dr Smith by March 31 at the latest.

Class participants should communicate by email with Dr Smith to determine topic and scope of your video presentation and accompanying materials.

Grading will be based on:

1. forum participation (25%)

2. 20 minute youtube video (25%)

3. associated powerpoint slides (25%)

4. associated essay (25%)

For policy regarding incompletes see here

For academic integrity policy see here