Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence 2020: Difference between revisions
From NCOR Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Draft Schedule''' | '''Draft Schedule''' | ||
==Wed Feb 19 | ==Wed Feb 19 ''Time to be confirmed''== | ||
:Introduction to philosophy for AI scientists | :Introduction to philosophy for AI scientists | ||
::A practical problem -- the need for consistently curated data | ::A practical problem -- the need for consistently curated data | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Thu Feb 20 09:30 - 12:15 3h== | ==Thu Feb 20 09:30 - 12:15 3h== | ||
: | :Turing's test and Searle's Chinese Room argument | ||
:: | :Intelligence vs. consciousness | ||
:: | ::What is intelligence and what do intelligence tests measure? | ||
:: | :General AI vs. Narrow AI | ||
:Readings: | |||
::[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no general AI] | |||
::[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-019-09969-z Humanness] | |||
==Fri Feb 21 09:30 - 12:15 3h== | |||
:Affordances and the background of Artificial Intelligence | |||
::[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918.pdf Making AI Meaningful Again] | |||
:Basic Formal Ontology (ISO/IEC 21838-2) | :Basic Formal Ontology (ISO/IEC 21838-2) | ||
::The origins of Basic Formal Ontology | ::The origins of Basic Formal Ontology | ||
| Line 21: | Line 28: | ||
::How ontologies are used in information and data science | ::How ontologies are used in information and data science | ||
==Tue May 19 14:30 - 17:15 3h== | ==Tue May 19 14:30 - 17:15 3h== | ||
Revision as of 16:54, 18 February 2020
Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence
Draft Schedule
Wed Feb 19 Time to be confirmed
- Introduction to philosophy for AI scientists
- A practical problem -- the need for consistently curated data
- How ontology can solve this problem
- The history of philosophy from an ontological perspective
- How philosophy can benefit AI science
Thu Feb 20 09:30 - 12:15 3h
- Turing's test and Searle's Chinese Room argument
- Intelligence vs. consciousness
- What is intelligence and what do intelligence tests measure?
- General AI vs. Narrow AI
- Readings:
Fri Feb 21 09:30 - 12:15 3h
- Affordances and the background of Artificial Intelligence
- Basic Formal Ontology (ISO/IEC 21838-2)
- The origins of Basic Formal Ontology
- Why should an ontology become an ISO standard?
- What you can do with BFO in philosophy
- How ontologies are used in information and data science
Tue May 19 14:30 - 17:15 3h
- AI and Transhumanism: Can we download the contents of our brains onto a computer and become immortal?
- https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]
- AI and the meaning of life:
- AI and The Matrix
Wed May 20 09:30 - 12:15 3h
- There is no general AI
- The Turing test
- AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events
- Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons
- AI is not artificial intelligence; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data
- The Turing test
Fri May 22 9:30 - 12:15 3h
- Artificial intelligence and digital manufacturing
Tue May 26 14:30 - 17:15 3h
- The problem of meaningful AI
- AI and intelligence analysis
- The Cognitive Process Ontology
- Warrant
Wed May 27 13:30 - 17:00 4h
- Driverless philosophy / Philosophy on rails
Thu May 28 09:30 - 12:15 3h
- Dialogue with Jobst Landgrebe (Cognotekt, Cologne) on the Social Impact of AI
Further Background Reading
- Gerald J. Erion and Barry Smith, “In Defense of Truth: Skepticism, Morality, and The Matrix”, in W. Irwin (ed.), Philosophy and The Matrix, La Salle and Chicago: Open Court, 2002, 16–27.
- Max More and Natasha Vita-More (Eds.), The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
- Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith, “Making AI Meaningful Again”, Synthese, DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y
