Analytic Metaphysics
The Course
This course consists in an overview of central themes in analytic metaphysics viewed from a broadly realist perspective. We begin with a historical overview of analytic metaphysics and a discussion of general categories such as universals, particulars, processes, dispositions and functions. We then extend these general categories to specific areas such as social reality, documents and document acts, disease, money, and war. The course will be of interest not only to philosophers but also to those interested in ontological applications.
Department of Philosophy: Special Topics PHI 598. Registration number: 24232
Time: Tuesdays, 1-3:50pm, Spring 2016
Room: 141 Park Hall, UB North Campus
Instructor: Barry Smith
Office hours: Tuesdays, 12:15-1pm and by appointment via email to [1]
Recommended background reading
- R. Arp, B. Smith, A. D. Spear, Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology
- John R. Searle, Making the Social World
- E. J. Lowe, The Four Category Ontology
- Roman Ingarden, The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Language
Schedule
February 2: Analytic Metaphysics: Introduction and Historical Background
Aristotle
- What's Wrong with Contemporary Philosophy?
- Austrian Philosophy
- Objects and Their Environments: From Aristotle to Ecological Ontology
- Pieces of a Theory
- Slides
- Video
February 9: Ontology of Deontic Entities
- Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology, Chapter 5
- Massively Planned Social Agency
- Document Acts and the Ontology of Social Reality
- John Searle: From Speech Acts to Social Reality
- Slides Contents
- Video
February 16: Ontology of Deontic Entities (continued)
- Massively Planned Social Agency
- Slides
- Video
- See also materials here
February 23: Ontological Realism
- Individuals, Universals and Collections
- Fiat Objects
- Endurantist and Perdurantist Accounts of Persistence
- Slides
- Video
March 1: Material Entities and Process Profiles
- Classifying Processes: An Essay in Applied Ontology
- On Classifying Material Entities in Basic Formal Ontology
- Slides
- Video
March 8: Mind, Language, Intentionality, Emotions, Truth, and Aboutness
March 22: Document Acts
March 29: Money
- The Construction of Social Reality
- Money and Fictions
- Toward a Science of Emerging Media
- Slides
- Video
April 5: The Ontology of Classification
April 12: Organisms and Environments
April 19: Terrorism, Wars and Warfighting
- Defining Terrorism
- An Ontological Framework for Understanding the Terror-Crime Nexus
- Military Ontology
- Slides
- Video
April 26: Presentations of Student Projects 1
1:00pm John Beverley: Basic Formal Ontology Slides Video
1:25pm J. Neil Otte: Game Theory Ontology Slides Video
1:50pm Kejin Cui: Ontology and Spatial Relations Between Land Types Slides Video
2:15pm Brian Donohue: Deontic Ontology Slides
2:40pm Daniel Shaffer: The Problem of Customary Law for Legal Ontologies Slides Video
3:05pm Alec Sculley: Tolerable Delinquency Slides
May 3: Presentations of Student Projects 2
1:00pm Jeon-Young Kang: Qualitative Reasoning with GPS Sensor Data to Estimate Infectious Disease Transmission Slides Video
1:30pm Fumiaki Toyoshima: Towards an Ontology of Schizophrenia Slides Video
2:00pm Francesco Franda: Defining ‘Terrorism’ Slides Video
2:30pm Carter Benson: The Problem with Defining ‘Terrorism’ Slides Video
3:00pm Uriah Burke: How should BFO classify film? Slides Video
Grading and Related Policies and Services
All students will be required to take an active part in class discussions throughout the semester and to prepare a paper on some relevant topic. The paper should be submitted in a draft version on or before March 29, and in final form on or before May 3. A powerpoint version will be presented in class in one or other of the two closing sessions .
Your grade will be determined in three equal portions deriving from:
- 1. class participation (2.5% per class attended)
- 2. paper (3000 words; deadline for draft: March 29; deadline for final version: May 3)
- 3. class presentation (graded according to quality of powerpoint slides, quality of delivery, and quality of response to questions)
For policy regarding incompletes see here
For academic integrity policy see here
For accessibility services see here
