Ontology of Finance
Venue: Park 141, University at Buffalo (North Campus) & Zoom
Date: May 7, 2022
Program:
9:00 am Barry Smith: Introduction and Welcome
9:15 am Achille Varzi: Derivative Instruments
10:00 am Olivier Massin: Providing, Exchanging, Selling
Break
10:45 am Francesco Guala: Performativity Rationalized
11:15 am Emiliano Ippoliti: What is a financial crisis? Why a crisis? Some remarks on its ontological and epistemic preconditions
11:45 am Asya Passinsky: Cryptocurrency
Lunch
13:15 pm Samir Chopra: Artificial Agents
14:00 pm Nicolas Brisset: Emergence of Institutions or Performativity of Models
14:30 pm Gloria Sansò: The Role of Investor
Break
15:15 pm Christian Sprague: Towards a Market Ontology
Abstracts
Providing, Exchanging, Selling - Olivier Massin
On the standard view of exchanges, exchanges consists in transfers of goods motivated by inverse preferences. On the action theory of exchanges we developed with E. Tieffenbach, exchanges consists in mutual provisions of goods or services motivated by convergent preferences and prompted by offers. In that presentation, I shall address two questions left open by the action theory. I shall, first, provide a taxonomy of the various ways in which entities can be provided to persons. I shall, second, propose a definition of what selling and buying consist in.
Performativity Rationalized - Francesco Guala
Can the models of economics and finance be “performative"? Sociologists have been criticized for using the term “performativity” in a way that seems unfaithful to Austin’s notion. I will defend this usage, in particular against the claim that economic theories cannot constitute illocutionary acts. I will argue that a performative speech act in Austin’s sense is essentially a correlation device, and I will illustrate how such a device may work, focusing on MacKenzie’s study of the Black–Scholes model of option pricing. The goal is to show that Austin’s speech acts and the models of economic theory may perform similar functions in certain conditions. So economics may be performative in Austin’s sense.
What is a financial crisis? Why a crisis? Some remarks on its ontological and epistemic preconditions - Emiliano Ippoliti
What is a financial crisis? Why a crisis? The answers to these fundamental questions require to characterize the ontological as well as the epistemic state of the financial markets, by identifying the causes, its basic entities, and their relations, of a financial crisis. In my talk, I examine how a few main theories on financial systems—like the efficient market hypothesis, the reflexive market hypothesis, econophysics, etc.—conceptualize the financial crises. In more detail, I analyze how these theories: a) tell apart different causes (e.g. ‘endogenous’ vs ‘exogenous’ factors, ‘remote’ vs ‘proximate’) of financial crises. b) conceive the basic entities and units of analysis (e.g. individuals vs aggregate), c) define what we can know about those causes and entities, and what they can reveal about an impending financial crisis. I use stock markets' crashes as an example to outline a few ontological and epistemic preconditions for a financial crisis.
Towards a market ontology - Christian Sprague
In this paper we propose three terms that lay the foundation for a Market Ontology (MO) that is conformant with Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Finance, marketing, and economics professionals use a wide swath of market related terms, but currently do not use them in reference to a domain ontology. MO is intended as a tool that situates these terms into a representational artifact which can be reused in contexts that address human social behavior related to economic activity. In this paper we present our definition for three terms: market, marketplace, and market region. To do so, we first compare several definitions for the term “market”, highlight the common features ascribed to the term, and propose our definition. Next, we propose definitions for the terms marketplace and market region. We conclude with a forward-looking discussion on the development of a MO.
