Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence 2024: Difference between revisions

From NCOR Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(37 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
We will describe in detail how stochastic AI work, and consider these and a series of other questions at the borderlines of philosophy and AI. The class will close with presentations of papers on relevant topics given by students.
We will describe in detail how stochastic AI work, and consider these and a series of other questions at the borderlines of philosophy and AI. The class will close with presentations of papers on relevant topics given by students.


Much of the material for this class is derived from our book  
Some of the material for this class is derived from our book  


:''[https://buffalo.app.box.com/v/AI-Without-Fear Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]'' (Routledge 2022).  
:''[https://buffalo.app.box.com/v/AI-Without-Fear Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]'' (Routledge 2022).  
Line 25: Line 25:
and from the companion volume
and from the companion volume


:''Symposium'' on Jobst ''Why Machines Will Never Rule the World'' — Guest editor, Janna Hastings, University of Zurich  
:''[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/submissions/upcoming-issues/Cosmos+Taxis Symposium'' on ''Why Machines Will Never Rule the World''] — Guest editor, Janna Hastings, University of Zurich  


which will appear as a special issue of the public access journal ''Cosmos + Taxis'' in early 2024.  
which will appear as a special issue of the public access journal ''Cosmos + Taxis'' in early 2024.  
Line 32: Line 32:
'''Faculty'''
'''Faculty'''


[https://www.cognotekt.com/en/ Jobst Landgrebe] is the founder and CEO of Cognotekt, GmBH, an AI company based in Cologne specialised in the design and implementation of holistic AI solutions. He has 17 years experience in the AI field, 8 years as a management consultant and software architect. He has also worked as a physician and mathematician.
[https://www.cognotekt.com/en/ Jobst Landgrebe] is the founder and CEO of Cognotekt, GmBH, an AI company based in Cologne specialised in the design and implementation of holistic AI solutions. He has 20 years experience in the AI field, 8 years as a management consultant and software architect. He has also worked as a physician and mathematician, and he views AI itself -- to the extent that it is not an elaborate hype -- as a branch of applied mathematics. CUrrently his primary focus is in the biomathematics of cancer.


Barry Smith is one of the world's most [https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=search_authors&hl=en&mauthors=label:metaphysics widely cited philosophers]. He has contributed primarily to the field of applied ontology, which means applying philosophical ideas derived from analytical metaphysics to the concrete practical problems which arise where attempts are made to compare or combine heterogeneous bodies of data.  
Barry Smith is one of the world's most [https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=search_authors&hl=en&mauthors=label:metaphysics widely cited philosophers]. He has contributed primarily to the field of applied ontology, which means applying philosophical ideas derived from analytical metaphysics to the concrete practical problems which arise where attempts are made to compare or combine heterogeneous bodies of data.  
Line 55: Line 55:
After introducing the relevant ideas and tools from both AI and philosophy, all the aforementioned questions will be thoroughly addressed in class discussions. The class will close with presentations of papers on relevant topics given by students.
After introducing the relevant ideas and tools from both AI and philosophy, all the aforementioned questions will be thoroughly addressed in class discussions. The class will close with presentations of papers on relevant topics given by students.


'''Very Early Draft Schedule'''
'''Grading'''
:Essay with presentation: 80%
:Essay with no presentation: 95%
:Presentation: 15%
:Class Participation 5%


==Tuesday, February 20 (14:30-17:15) Why Machines Will Never Rule the world ==
'''Draft Schedule'''


This is an introduction to the book, with an emphasis on the relation between a human mind and the intelligence that might be ascribed to a machine
==Tuesday, February 20 (14:30-17:15) Introduction: Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence ==
 
:Room: A23
 
We begin with a survey of the development of AI research from 1970 to today, paying attention especially to the background role of ontology (Knowledge Graphs) in  this development.
 
We then outline the main theses of the recent book, ''[https://buffalo.app.box.com/v/AI-Without-Fear Why Machines Will Never Rule the World]'', by Landgrebe and Smith, before moving on to discuss the relation between a human mind and the intelligence that might be ascribed to a machine.
 
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Introduction-Philosophy-and-AI Slides]
 
==Wednesday February 21 (14:30-17:15): The Glory and the Misery of ChatGPT==
 
:Room: A23
 
''Part 1: What is intelligence?''
 
All students are expected to have some familiarity with [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle's Chinese Room Argument].
 
Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are ''about'' something. Searle: [https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf  Minds, Brains, and Programs]
 
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/vw99q3dexcdd4as4a8blvfh33woq2wbg Slides]
 
What are the essential marks of human intelligence? 


The classical psychological definitions of intelligence are:  
The classical psychological definitions of intelligence are:  
Line 66: Line 92:
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience 
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience 


What are the essential marks of human intelligence? 
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?


Readings:
Readings:
Line 73: Line 99:
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]


==Wednesday February 21 (9:30-12:15 noon): The Glory and the Misery of ChatGPT==
''Part 2: An introduction to ChatGPT. How is it built? How does it work? Is it intelligent?''
 
:Room:
 
An introduction to ChatGPT. How is it built? How does it work? Is it intelligent?


Can ChatGPT become intelligent?
Can ChatGPT become intelligent?
Line 89: Line 111:
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Slides]
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Slides]


'''The human brain and the Theory of complex systems'''
The human brain and the Theory of complex systems


:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918.pdf Making AI Meaningful Again]
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918.pdf Making AI Meaningful Again]
:[https://www.academia.edu/93423257/Introduction_to_the_Theory_of_Complex_Systems S. Thurner et al. (2018): Introduction to the theory of complex systems (Oxford)]
:[https://www.academia.edu/93423257/Introduction_to_the_Theory_of_Complex_Systems S. Thurner et al. (2018): Introduction to the theory of complex systems (Oxford)]


==Thursday, February 22 (14:30 - 17:15): Language and Natural Intelligence ==
==Thursday, February 22 (14:30 - 17:15): Can an Artificial Intelligence Act? ==
 
:Room: A23
 
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/n70b84o813hp0jsfnznczeg8sid9mtnv AI Ethics Slides]
 
''What is agency?''
 
:Featuring Emanuele Martinelli. Emanuele is a PhD student in philosophy at the University of Zurich, co-affiliated with the Chair of Political Philosophy and the Digital Society Initiative. He has a bachelor's in philosophy and a master's in philosophy and economics, both from USI.


Language Structure and Language Economy
:What are the different types of agency?
:Examples of collective agency, government agency, agency of socio-technical systems (armies, corporations, ...)
:Relation between agency and responsibility. (Responsibility as the origin of ethics.)
:Can an AI be responsibe?
:Can there be such a thing as an AI will?


Large Language Models
''Agency and the capacities and limits of AI''
:Case study: AI and economic planning
:Hayek's knowledge problem
:The price system and market competition
:Market economies vs planned economies: the agents at stake
:Proposed ways to use AI to plan the economy
:The role of the entrepreneur
:Can AI be entrepreneurial


Natural Intelligence
Background reading:
:"[https://www.rcandela.com/uploads/2/0/1/6/20163847/boettke_and_candela_on_the_feasibility_of_technosocialism.pdf On the Feasibility of Technosocialism]"
:"[http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/19406/7/List-GA-AI.pdf Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence]"
:"[https://www.argumenta.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Argumenta-82-Emanuele-Martinelli-Toward-a-General-Model-of-Agency-1.pdf Toward a General Model of Agency]"


==Friday, February 23 (9:30 - 12:15) Minds, Brains and Programs==
==Friday, February 23 (9:30 - 12:15) No Machine Will ==


Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are about something. 
:Room: A23
:John Searle: [https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf  Minds, Brains, and Programs]


Computers cannot have a will, because computers ''don't give a damn'':
Computers cannot have a will, because computers ''don't give a damn''. Therefore there can be no machine ethics


:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather' says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” ''Fortune'', June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather' says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” ''Fortune'', June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].
Line 120: Line 163:
==Monday, May 13 (9:30 - 12:15) Does AI Pose a Threat to Humanity?==
==Monday, May 13 (9:30 - 12:15) Does AI Pose a Threat to Humanity?==


Background: '''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rnam1w8ztM Will AI Destroy Humanity? A Soho Forum Debate]''' (Spoiler: Jobst won)
:Room: A23


Motion: Artificial Intelligence Poses a Threat to the Survival of Humanity that must be Actively Addressed by Government
Motion: Artificial Intelligence Poses a Threat to the Survival of Humanity that must be Actively Addressed by Government
Line 130: Line 173:
:Are efforts on the part of big companies to regulate AI in fact attempts by those big companies to block new entrants into the market?
:Are efforts on the part of big companies to regulate AI in fact attempts by those big companies to block new entrants into the market?


==Tuesday, May 14 (9:30 - 12:15) From Turing Machines to Quantum Computers ==
Background: '''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rnam1w8ztM Will AI Destroy Humanity? A Soho Forum Debate]''' (Spoiler: Jobst won)
 
==Tuesday, May 14 (9:30 - 12:15) Are we living in a simulation? ==


Turing Machines
:Room: A23
:Church-Turing computability
:Classical computation: binary logic of computers, registers, logic gates and circuits, examples of circuits


Quantum Mechanics
David Chalmers' theory of (virtual) reality (''Reality+'', 2022)
:Introduction, double slit, uncertainty, Stern-Gerlach, Hamiltonian, Hilbert space
:Chalmers' main arguments
:Quantum computing
:A refuation of the brain-in-a-vat theory
:Why modern physics is incomplete


Quantum bits, registers, quantum gates, simple quantum algorithm, quantum error (correction), future of quantum computing
==Wednesday May 15 (9:30 - 12:15): Are we living in a simulation? (II), digital twins and and Certifiable AI  ==
:Philosophical interpretation of quantum computing


Why quantum computers are Turing machines
:Room: A23


Background
More on David Chalmers' theory of reality
:Mikhail Dyakonov, ''[https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-case-against-quantum-computing The Case Against Quantum Computing]''
:Nielsen and Chuang, ''[https://csis.pace.edu/~ctappert/cs837-19spring/QC-textbook.pdf Quantum Computation and Quantum Information]''
:[https://youtu.be/_mvoS_H_kA8 Quantum Computing 1]
:[https://youtu.be/BB89YcLeAko Quantum Computing 2]
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Quantum-Computing-1 Slides]


==Wednesday May 15 (9:30 - 12:15): The Use of AI in Scientific and Medical Research ==
Digital twins


==Thursday May 16 (14:30 - 18:15) AI and Complex Systems==
Certifiable AI vs Explainable AI


What does it mean to say that Large Language Models are models?
==Thursday May 16 (14:30 - 18:15) The Replication Problem==


How do we define 'model'?
:Room: A23


'''The Limits of Mathematical Models and the Limits of AI'''
''Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay''
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/xnmc8zi1btpnku365bysxmowcgk99epd Slides]
:All science requires mathematical models
:Types of models 1: descriptive, explanatory, predictive
:Types of models 2: qualitative, quantitative
:All predictive models are quantitative
:Synoptic and Adequate models
:Computability
<!--
:::All AI engineering requires mathematical models
::::Explicit and implicit mathematical models -->


'''Systems'''
:The 'replication problem' is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of 'open science'. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy.
:System elements and system interactions
:Systems are fiat entities: they are a product of delimitation
:System boundaries
:Relatively isolated systems
:Intentions and drivenness
:No emulation of animate drivenness


'''AI and the Mathematics of Complex Systems'''
Background:
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/xnmc8zi1btpnku365bysxmowcgk99epd Slides]
 
:Comprehensive and partial models             
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'', 2018
:The scope of extended Newtonian mathematics         
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]
:Seven Properties of complex systems               
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020
:Examples of complex systems                   
::Human beings as complex systems
::Complex systems of complex systems
::Animate complex systems are organized and stable
   
<!--Mathematical models of complex systems
:::Multivariate distributions                      
:::Adequate models for complex systems           
:::Predictive models of complex systems
::::Why we ain’t rich
:::::Example of a social fact-->
<!--'''Approaches to complex system modelling'''
:::Naïve approaches
:::Consequences for AI applications
:::Refined approaches
::::Scaling
:::Explicit networks
::::Evolutionary process models
::::Entropy models
:::Complex system emulation requires complex systems-->
'''AI and the Ontology of Power, Social Interaction and Ethics'''
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiBBS8ueyz4 Preliminary Video]


==Friday May 17 (9:30-12:15) Student Presentations and Concluding Survey==
==Friday May 17 (9:30-12:15) Student Presentations and Concluding Survey==
:Room: A23


:'''Student Presentations'''
:'''Student Presentations'''

Latest revision as of 19:11, 4 May 2024

Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence 2024

Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith

MAP, USI, Lugano, Spring 2024

Background

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as intelligent. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called General Artificial Intelligence (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being.

Since its inception in the middle of the last century AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created which are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do.

These developments in AI open up a series of questions such as:

Will the powers of AI continue to grow in the future, and if so will they ever reach the point where they can be said to have intelligence equivalent to or greater than that of a human being?
Could we ever reach the point where we can accept the thesis that an AI system could have something like consciousness or sentience?
Could we reach the point where an AI system could be said to behave ethically, or to have responsibility for its actions.
Can quantum computers enable a stronger AI than what we have today?

We will describe in detail how stochastic AI work, and consider these and a series of other questions at the borderlines of philosophy and AI. The class will close with presentations of papers on relevant topics given by students.

Some of the material for this class is derived from our book

Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear (Routledge 2022).

and from the companion volume

Symposium on Why Machines Will Never Rule the World — Guest editor, Janna Hastings, University of Zurich

which will appear as a special issue of the public access journal Cosmos + Taxis in early 2024.


Faculty

Jobst Landgrebe is the founder and CEO of Cognotekt, GmBH, an AI company based in Cologne specialised in the design and implementation of holistic AI solutions. He has 20 years experience in the AI field, 8 years as a management consultant and software architect. He has also worked as a physician and mathematician, and he views AI itself -- to the extent that it is not an elaborate hype -- as a branch of applied mathematics. CUrrently his primary focus is in the biomathematics of cancer.

Barry Smith is one of the world's most widely cited philosophers. He has contributed primarily to the field of applied ontology, which means applying philosophical ideas derived from analytical metaphysics to the concrete practical problems which arise where attempts are made to compare or combine heterogeneous bodies of data.

Course Description

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as intelligent. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. Recent striking successes such as AlphaFold have convinced many not only that this objective is obtainable but also that in a not too distant future machines will become even more intelligent than human beings.

The actual and possible developments in AI open up a series of striking questions such as:

  • Can a computer have a conscious mind?
  • Can a computer have desires, a will, and emotions?
  • Can a computer have responsibility for its behavior
  • Would machine intelligence, if there is such a thing, be something comparable to human intelligence or something quite different?

In addition, new developments in the AI field make it possible for us to consider a series of philosophical questions in a new light, including:

  • Could a machine have something like a personal identity? Would I really survive if the contents of my brain were uploaded to the cloud?
  • What is it for a human to behave in an ethical manner? (Could there be something like machine ethics? Could machines used in fighting wars be programmed to behave ethically?)
  • What is a meaningful life? If routine, meaningless work in the future is performed entirely by machines, will this make possible new sorts of meaningful lives on the part of humans?

After introducing the relevant ideas and tools from both AI and philosophy, all the aforementioned questions will be thoroughly addressed in class discussions. The class will close with presentations of papers on relevant topics given by students.

Grading

Essay with presentation: 80%
Essay with no presentation: 95%
Presentation: 15%
Class Participation 5%

Draft Schedule

Tuesday, February 20 (14:30-17:15) Introduction: Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence

Room: A23

We begin with a survey of the development of AI research from 1970 to today, paying attention especially to the background role of ontology (Knowledge Graphs) in this development.

We then outline the main theses of the recent book, Why Machines Will Never Rule the World, by Landgrebe and Smith, before moving on to discuss the relation between a human mind and the intelligence that might be ascribed to a machine.

Slides

Wednesday February 21 (14:30-17:15): The Glory and the Misery of ChatGPT

Room: A23

Part 1: What is intelligence?

All students are expected to have some familiarity with Searle's Chinese Room Argument.

Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are about something. Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs

Slides

What are the essential marks of human intelligence? 

The classical psychological definitions of intelligence are:  

A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) 
B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience 

Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?

Readings:

Linda S. Gottfredson. Mainstream Science on Intelligence. In: Intelligence 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.

Human and machine intelligence

Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: There is no Artificial General Intelligence

Part 2: An introduction to ChatGPT. How is it built? How does it work? Is it intelligent?

Can ChatGPT become intelligent?

Are Large Language Models a threat to humanity?

Capabilities, or: What do IQ tests measure?

Slides

Is Psychology Finished?

Slides

The human brain and the Theory of complex systems

Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: Making AI Meaningful Again
S. Thurner et al. (2018): Introduction to the theory of complex systems (Oxford)

Thursday, February 22 (14:30 - 17:15): Can an Artificial Intelligence Act?

Room: A23
AI Ethics Slides

What is agency?

Featuring Emanuele Martinelli. Emanuele is a PhD student in philosophy at the University of Zurich, co-affiliated with the Chair of Political Philosophy and the Digital Society Initiative. He has a bachelor's in philosophy and a master's in philosophy and economics, both from USI.
What are the different types of agency?
Examples of collective agency, government agency, agency of socio-technical systems (armies, corporations, ...)
Relation between agency and responsibility. (Responsibility as the origin of ethics.)
Can an AI be responsibe?
Can there be such a thing as an AI will?

Agency and the capacities and limits of AI

Case study: AI and economic planning
Hayek's knowledge problem
The price system and market competition
Market economies vs planned economies: the agents at stake
Proposed ways to use AI to plan the economy
The role of the entrepreneur
Can AI be entrepreneurial

Background reading:

"On the Feasibility of Technosocialism"
"Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence"
"Toward a General Model of Agency"

Friday, February 23 (9:30 - 12:15) No Machine Will

Room: A23

Computers cannot have a will, because computers don't give a damn. Therefore there can be no machine ethics

The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather' says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” Fortune, June 15, 2023. See also here.

Implications of the absence of a machine will:

The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise
The idea of digital immortality will never be realized Slides
The idea that human beings are simulations can be rejected
There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)
Fermi's paradox is solved

Monday, May 13 (9:30 - 12:15) Does AI Pose a Threat to Humanity?

Room: A23

Motion: Artificial Intelligence Poses a Threat to the Survival of Humanity that must be Actively Addressed by Government

Topics to be dealt with include:

Is "AI ethics" a misnomer (rather like "gun ethics" or "car ethics")?
How, if at all, can we regulate the use of AI for military purposes?
Are efforts to regulate AI naive?
Are efforts on the part of big companies to regulate AI in fact attempts by those big companies to block new entrants into the market?

Background: Will AI Destroy Humanity? A Soho Forum Debate (Spoiler: Jobst won)

Tuesday, May 14 (9:30 - 12:15) Are we living in a simulation?

Room: A23

David Chalmers' theory of (virtual) reality (Reality+, 2022)

Chalmers' main arguments
A refuation of the brain-in-a-vat theory
Why modern physics is incomplete

Wednesday May 15 (9:30 - 12:15): Are we living in a simulation? (II), digital twins and and Certifiable AI

Room: A23

More on David Chalmers' theory of reality

Digital twins

Certifiable AI vs Explainable AI

Thursday May 16 (14:30 - 18:15) The Replication Problem

Room: A23

Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay

The 'replication problem' is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of 'open science'. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy.

Background:

Reproducibility of Scientific Results, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2018
Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade
Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash, Barry Smith, Youtube 2020

Friday May 17 (9:30-12:15) Student Presentations and Concluding Survey

Room: A23
Student Presentations

Background Material

An Introduction to AI for Philosophers

Video
Slides

(AI experts are invited to criticize what I have to say in this talk)

An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists

Video
Slides

(Philosophers are invited to criticize what I have to say in this talk)

John McCarthy, "What has AI in common with philosophy?"

Retrieved from "https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Philosophy_and_Artificial_Intelligence_2024&oldid=74294"