CTSA Ontology Workshop: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Principal Focus''' | '''Principal Focus''' | ||
The principal focus of the meeting is on the use of ontologies in the evaluation of scientific research, and specifically in the evaluation | The principal focus of the meeting is on the use of ontologies in the evaluation of scientific research, and specifically in the evaluation of CTSA activities. The proposal is that when data are harvested from institutional sources, these data can be aggregated using common ontologies such as are maintained by the eagle-i and VIVO initiatives. | ||
As these data accumulate they can compared at regular intervals for purposes of tracking and evaluation of research activities | As these data accumulate they can be compared at regular intervals for purposes of tracking and evaluation of research activities. The system could be used to generate reports on research activities filtered by type, location, or temporally defined range. | ||
Interestingly, the use of common ontologies will mean that the data could also be exploited for other purposes. First, they will make all research-relevant activities easily searchable in something like the way that publications databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar already make publications easily searchable. Second, they will make results of different sorts of research activities combinable, since the same ontologies will be used to annotate, for example, clinical studies, as are used to describe mentorship opportunities or patient outreach initiatives. Third, because common ontologies are being used, all of the information collected will discoverable not only be those working within the collecting institution, but also by individuals, institutions and software agents, on the outside. | |||
'''Subgoals''' | '''Subgoals''' | ||
The specific subgoals of the meeting are as follows: | |||
1. To identify existing experiments in ontology-based tracking and evaluation of research activities, especially within the framework of the CTSA consortium, and to share the lessons learned from such experiments | |||
2. To identify | |||
for instance to identify collaborators with specific sorts of expertise, to identify . | |||
-- for example pertaining to appointments, grants, publications, mentorship, and so forth -- | |||
:-- explore a strategy to create an evaluation and tracking system for an organization like a CTSA based on, or working with, a university-wide system for faculty reporting | :-- explore a strategy to create an evaluation and tracking system for an organization like a CTSA based on, or working with, a university-wide system for faculty reporting | ||
Revision as of 13:41, 28 November 2012
Venue: To be determined, almost certainly at a hotel close to a major Florida airport
Date: February 11-12, 2013
Principal Focus
The principal focus of the meeting is on the use of ontologies in the evaluation of scientific research, and specifically in the evaluation of CTSA activities. The proposal is that when data are harvested from institutional sources, these data can be aggregated using common ontologies such as are maintained by the eagle-i and VIVO initiatives.
As these data accumulate they can be compared at regular intervals for purposes of tracking and evaluation of research activities. The system could be used to generate reports on research activities filtered by type, location, or temporally defined range.
Interestingly, the use of common ontologies will mean that the data could also be exploited for other purposes. First, they will make all research-relevant activities easily searchable in something like the way that publications databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar already make publications easily searchable. Second, they will make results of different sorts of research activities combinable, since the same ontologies will be used to annotate, for example, clinical studies, as are used to describe mentorship opportunities or patient outreach initiatives. Third, because common ontologies are being used, all of the information collected will discoverable not only be those working within the collecting institution, but also by individuals, institutions and software agents, on the outside.
Subgoals
The specific subgoals of the meeting are as follows:
1. To identify existing experiments in ontology-based tracking and evaluation of research activities, especially within the framework of the CTSA consortium, and to share the lessons learned from such experiments
2. To identify for instance to identify collaborators with specific sorts of expertise, to identify . -- for example pertaining to appointments, grants, publications, mentorship, and so forth --
- -- explore a strategy to create an evaluation and tracking system for an organization like a CTSA based on, or working with, a university-wide system for faculty reporting
- -- create an ontology (analogous to OBI) to support evaluation measurement
This meeting will also serve as the inaugural meeting of the new CTSA Ontology Affinity Group
Participants will include:
- Sivaram Arabandi (Smart Content Team, Elsevier)
- Mathias Brochhausen (Arkansas CTSA)
- Michael Conlon (University of Florida CTSA / VIVO)
- James Demery (University of Florida CTSA)
- Melissa Haendel (Oregon / CTSAconnect)
- William Hogan (Arkansas CTSA)
- Warren Kibbe (Northwestern CTSA)
- Barry Smith (Buffalo)
- Dagobert Soergel (Buffalo)
- Carlo Torniai (Oregon / CTSAconnect)
Organizers: William Hogan and Barry Smith
Sponsor: Translational Research Institute of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Further information: Please write to Barry Smith
