Ontology 101: Difference between revisions
From NCOR Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::capability | ::capability | ||
::system | ::system | ||
::GDC role / GDC function | |||
:: | :: | ||
:realism | :realism | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
:singular nouns | :singular nouns | ||
:mass nouns | :mass nouns | ||
:GDC, ICE | :specific dependence | ||
: | :generic dependence GDC, ICE | ||
:copyable patterns, concretizations | |||
:dispositions and qualities | :dispositions and qualities | ||
:capabilities and functions | :capabilities and functions | ||
Latest revision as of 14:10, 17 December 2024
- Ontology illustration
- BFO+
- stasis
- process profile
- capability
- system
- GDC role / GDC function
- realism
- Top-Level Ontology and hub-spokes approach
- universal / instance
- singular nouns
- mass nouns
- specific dependence
- generic dependence GDC, ICE
- copyable patterns, concretizations
- dispositions and qualities
- capabilities and functions
- roles
- the all-some rule
- single inheritance
- the Aristotle definition of substance rule
- the universal quantification rule (why you can't say 'Tylenol pill' is a 'pill which cures headache')
- the no-multiple-inheritance rule (asserted vs. inferred)
Ontology Pitfall Scanner: https://oops.linkeddata.es/catalogue.jsp
Definitions and axioms in first-order logic must be kept separate from each other: the definition of a term x is designed to be the shortest and logically simplest specification of necessary and sufficient conditions for being and instance of x. The axioms specify additional distinguishing marks which are seen as holding for all such instances. The advantages of this strategy are: 1. definitions are easy to understand and easy to apply, 2. definitions are more stable in the sense that new kinds of x might be discovered, or might evolve, which falsify one or other axiom, but still satisfy the definition.
